|
|
Preclinical Study of Single-Dose Moxidectin,a New Oral Treatment for Scabies: Efficacy,Safety,and Pharmacokinetics Compared to Two-Dose Ivermectin in a Porcine Model
|
|
|
|
|
نویسنده
|
bernigaud c. ,fang f. ,fischer k. ,lespine a. ,aho l.s. ,dreau d. ,kelly a. ,sutra j.-f. ,moreau f. ,lilin t. ,botterel f. ,guillot j. ,chosidow o.
|
منبع
|
plos neglected tropical diseases - 2016 - دوره : 10 - شماره : 10
|
چکیده
|
Background: scabies is one of the commonest dermatological conditions globally; however it is a largely underexplored and truly neglected infectious disease. foremost,improvement in the management of this public health burden is imperative. current treatments with topical agents and/or oral ivermectin (ivm) are insufficient and drug resistance is emerging. moxidectin (mox),with more advantageous pharmacological profiles may be a promising alternative. methodology/principal findings: using a porcine scabies model,12 pigs were randomly assigned to receive orally either mox (0.3 mg/kg once),ivm (0.2 mg/kg twice) or no treatment. we evaluated treatment efficacies by assessing mite count,clinical lesions,pruritus and elisa-determined anti-s. scabiei igg antibodies reductions. plasma and skin pharmacokinetic profiles were determined. at day 14 post-treatment,all four mox-treated but only two ivm-treated pigs were mite-free. mox efficacy was 100% and remained unchanged until study-end (d47),compared to 62% (range 26–100%) for ivm,with one ivm-treated pig remaining infected until d47. clinical scabies lesions,pruritus and anti-s. scabiei igg antibodies had completely disappeared in all mox-treated but only 75% of ivm-treated pigs. mox persisted ~9 times longer than ivm in plasma and skin,thereby covering the mite’s entire life cycle and enabling long-lasting efficacy. conclusions/significance: our data demonstrate that oral single-dose mox was more effective than two consecutive ivm-doses,supporting mox as potential therapeutic approach for scabies. © 2016 bernigaud et al.
|
|
|
آدرس
|
research group dynamyc,ea 7380,enva,université paris-est (upe),maisons-alfort & créteil,france,aphp,hôpital henri-mondor,department of dermatology,upec,créteil, France, research group dynamyc,ea 7380,enva,université paris-est (upe),maisons-alfort & créteil,france,department of parasitology,college of animal science and technology,university of guangxi,nanning, China, infections diseases department,scabies laboratory,qimr berghofer medical research institute,brisbane,qld, Australia, toxalim,inra,inp-envt,inp-ei-purpan,université de toulouse iii paul sabatier,toulouse, France, epidemiology and infection control unit,university hospital of dijon,dijon, France, cecaveto,saint-allouestre, France, department of agriculture,fisheries and forestry,queensland animal science precinct,university of queensland,gatton campus,qld, Australia, toxalim,inra,inp-envt,inp-ei-purpan,université de toulouse iii paul sabatier,toulouse, France, centre de recherche biomédicale (crbm),enva,upe,maisons-alfort, France, centre de recherche biomédicale (crbm),enva,upe,maisons-alfort, France, research group dynamyc,ea 7380,enva,université paris-est (upe),maisons-alfort & créteil,france,aphp,hôpital henri-mondor,parasitology and mycology,department of microbiology,dhu vic,upec,créteil, France, research group dynamyc,ea 7380,enva,université paris-est (upe),maisons-alfort & créteil,france,department of parasitology and mycology,biopôle d'alfort,ecole nationale vétérinaire d'alfort,upe,maisons-alfort, France, aphp,hôpital henri-mondor,department of dermatology,upec,créteil,france,ea epiderme (epidémiologie en dermatologie et evaluation des thérapeutiques) and inserm,cic 1430,upe,créteil, France
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|