>
Fa   |   Ar   |   En
   Induction of labor versus expectant management in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes between 34 and 37 weeks: A randomized controlled trial  
   
نویسنده van der ham d.p. ,vijgen s.m.c. ,nijhuis j.g. ,van beek j.j. ,opmeer b.c. ,mulder a.l.m. ,moonen r. ,groenewout m. ,van pampus m.g. ,mantel g.d. ,bloemenkamp k.w.m. ,van wijngaarden w.j. ,sikkema m. ,haak m.c. ,pernet p.j.m. ,porath m. ,molkenboer j.f.m. ,kuppens s. ,kwee a. ,kars m.e. ,woiski m. ,weinans m.j.n. ,wildschut h.i.j. ,akerboom b.m.c. ,mol b.w.j. ,willekes c.
منبع plos medicine - 2012 - دوره : 9 - شماره : 4
چکیده    Background: at present,there is insufficient evidence to guide appropriate management of women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (pprom) near term. methods and findings: we conducted an open-label randomized controlled trial in 60 hospitals in the netherlands,which included non-laboring women with >24 h of pprom between 34 +0 and 37 +0 wk of gestation. participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to induction of labor (iol) or expectant management (em) using block randomization. the main outcome was neonatal sepsis. secondary outcomes included mode of delivery,respiratory distress syndrome (rds),and chorioamnionitis. patients and caregivers were not blinded to randomization status. we updated a prior meta-analysis on the effect of both interventions on neonatal sepsis,rds,and cesarean section rate. from 1 january 2007 to 9 september 2009,776 patients in 60 hospitals were eligible for the study,of which 536 patients were randomized. four patients were excluded after randomization. we allocated 266 women (268 neonates) to iol and 266 women (270 neonates) to em. neonatal sepsis occurred in seven (2.6%) newborns of women in the iol group and in 11 (4.1%) neonates in the em group (relative risk [rr] 0.64; 95% confidence interval [ci] 0.25 to 1.6). rds was seen in 21 (7.8%,iol) versus 17 neonates (6.3%,em) (rr 1.3; 95% ci 0.67 to 2.3),and a cesarean section was performed in 36 (13%,iol) versus 37 (14%,em) women (rr 0.98; 95% ci 0.64 to 1.50). the risk for chorioamnionitis was reduced in the iol group. no serious adverse events were reported. updating an existing meta-analysis with our trial results (the only eligible trial for the update) indicated rrs of 1.06 (95% ci 0.64 to 1.76) for neonatal sepsis (eight trials,1,230 neonates) and 1.27 (95% ci 0.98 to 1.65) for cesarean section (eight trials,1,222 women) for iol compared with em. conclusions: in women whose pregnancy is complicated by late pprom,neither our trial nor the updated meta-analysis indicates that iol substantially improves pregnancy outcomes compared with em. © 2012 van der ham et al.
آدرس department of obstetrics and gynecology,maastricht university medical center,grow-school for oncology and developmental biology,maastricht, Netherlands, department of obstetrics and gynecology,academic medical center amsterdam,amsterdam, Netherlands, department of obstetrics and gynecology,maastricht university medical center,grow-school for oncology and developmental biology,maastricht, Netherlands, department of obstetrics and gynecology,viecuri medical center,venlo, Netherlands, department of clinical epidemiology,biostatistics and bioinformatics,academic medical center amsterdam,amsterdam, Netherlands, department of pediatrics,maastricht university medical center,grow-school for oncology and developmental biology,maastricht, Netherlands, department of pediatrics,atrium medical center,heerlen, Netherlands, department of obstetrics and gynecology,university medical center groningen,groningen, Netherlands, department of obstetrics and gynecology,university medical center groningen,groningen, Netherlands, department of obstetrics and gynecology,isala klinieken,zwolle, Netherlands, department of obstetrics and gynecology,leiden university medical center,leiden, Netherlands, department of obstetrics and gynecology,bronovo hospital,the hague, Netherlands, department of obstetrics and gynecology,ziekenhuisgroep twente,almelo, Netherlands, department of obstetrics and gynecology,vu university medical center,amsterdam, Netherlands, department of obstetrics and gynecology,kennemer gasthuis,haarlem, Netherlands, department of obstetrics and gynecology,maxima medical center,veldhoven, Netherlands, department of obstetrics and gynecology,sint anna hospital,geldrop, Netherlands, department of obstetrics and gynecology,catharina hospital,eindhoven, Netherlands, department of obstetrics and gynecology,university medical center,utrecht, Netherlands, department of obstetrics and gynecology,sint antonius hospital,nieuwegein, Netherlands, department of obstetrics and gynecology,sint radboud university medical center,nijmegen, Netherlands, department of obstetrics and gynecology,gelderse vallei hospital,ede, Netherlands, department of obstetrics and gynecology,erasmus medical center,rotterdam, Netherlands, department of obstetrics and gynecology,albert schweitzer hospital,dordrecht, Netherlands, department of obstetrics and gynecology,academic medical center amsterdam,amsterdam, Netherlands, department of obstetrics and gynecology,maastricht university medical center,grow-school for oncology and developmental biology,maastricht, Netherlands
 
     
   
Authors
  
 
 

Copyright 2023
Islamic World Science Citation Center
All Rights Reserved