|
|
Motivated Independence? Implicit Party Identity Predicts Political Judgments Among Self-Proclaimed Independents
|
|
|
|
|
نویسنده
|
hawkins c.b. ,nosek b.a.
|
منبع
|
personality and social psychology bulletin - 2012 - دوره : 38 - شماره : 11 - صفحه:1437 -1452
|
چکیده
|
Reporting an independent political identity does not guarantee the absence of partisanship. independents demonstrated considerable variability in relative identification with republicans versus democrats as measured by an implicit association test (iat; m = 0.10,sd = 0.47). to test whether this variation predicted political judgment,participants read a newspaper article describing two competing welfare (study 1) or special education (study 2) policies. the authors manipulated which policy was proposed by which party. among self-proclaimed independents,those who were implicitly democratic preferred the liberal welfare plan,and those who were implicitly republican preferred the conservative welfare plan. regardless of the policy details,these implicit partisans preferred the policy proposed by their party,and this effect occurred more strongly for implicit than explicit plan preference. the authors suggest that implicitly partisan independents may consciously override some partisan influence when making explicit political judgments,and independents may identify as such to appear objective even when they are not. © 2012 by the society for personality and social psychology,inc.
|
کلیدواژه
|
identity; implicit cognition; partisanship; political ideology; political judgment
|
آدرس
|
department of psychology,university of virginia,102 gilmer hall,p.o. box 400400,charlottesville,va 22904-4400, United States, department of psychology,university of virginia,102 gilmer hall,p.o. box 400400,charlottesville,va 22904-4400, United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|