Perceiving Partners to Endorse Benevolent Sexism Attenuates Highly Anxious Women’s Negative Reactions to Conflict

Benevolent sexism prescribes that men are dependent on women in relationships and should cherish their partners. the current research examined whether perceiving male partners to endorse benevolent sexism attenuates highly anxious women’s negative reactions to relationship conflict. greater attachment anxiety was associated with greater distress and insecurity during couples’ conflict discussions (study 1),during daily conflict with intimate partners (study 2),and when recalling experiences of relationship conflict (study 3). however,this heightened distress and insecurity was attenuated when women (but not men) perceived their partner to strongly endorse benevolent sexism (studies 1-3) and thus believed their partner could be relied upon to remain invested (study 3b). these novel results illustrate that perceiving partners to endorse benevolent sexism alleviates anxious women’s insecure reactions to relationship threat by conveying partner’s continued reliability. implications of these security-enhancing effects are considered in light of the role benevolent sexism plays in sustaining gender inequality. © 2016,© 2016 by the society for personality and social psychology,inc.