assessing patient preferences for switching from warfarin to direct oral anticoagulants

Warfarin remains the most commonly prescribed oral anticoagulant in the united states, but it has disadvantages such as dietary interactions and frequent laboratory monitoring. direct oral anticoagulants (doacs) have been introduced as safer and equally effective alternatives to warfarin. this study assessed patient preference for warfarin or doac based on a willingness to pay more for potential doac benefits. current warfarin patients with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism enrolled in the university of utah health thrombosis service were given a one-time electronic survey that assessed preferences between warfarin and doacs using scenarios comparing effectiveness, safety, and convenience. when doacs were preferred, patients were asked how much more they would be willing to pay monthly for the perceived advantages associated with doacs. with 123 completed surveys, 68% of patients preferred to stay on warfarin. no particular factor influenced patient preference (lack of routine laboratory monitoring, lower risks of major bleeding, and fewer dietary interactions). reduced stroke risk was associated with the highest value (willing to pay an additional $21). considering all factors, patients preferring doacs would pay a median $18 extra per month for the additional benefits. prior exposure to doacs was associated with preference for doacs. many patients currently taking warfarin preferred to stay on warfarin when given the choice, despite doac benefits. willingness to pay extra for doac advantages did not exceed $20 in the majority of survey respondents. previous doac exposure influences patient preference and perceived value for doacs.