Allowing repeat winners

Unbiased lotteries seem the least unfair and simplest procedures to allocate scarce indivisible resources to those with equal claims. but,when lotteries are repeated,it is not immediately obvious whether prior winners should be included or excluded. as in design questions surrounding single-shot lotteries,considerations of self-interest and distributive social preferences may interact. we investigate preferences for allowing participation of earlier winners in sequential lotteries. we found a strong preference for exclusion,both in settings where subjects were involved,and those where they were not. subjects who answered questions about both settings did not differ in their tendency to prefer exclusion. stated rationales significantly predicted choice but did not predict switching of choices between the two settings.