|
|
|
|
Image theory's counting rule in clinical decision making: Does it describe how clinicians make patient-specific forecasts?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
نویسنده
|
falzer p.r. ,garman d.m.
|
|
منبع
|
judgment and decision making - 2012 - دوره : 7 - شماره : 3 - صفحه:268 -281
|
|
چکیده
|
The field of clinical decision making is polarized by two predominate views. one holds that treatment recommendations should conform with guidelines; the other emphasizes clinical expertise in reaching case-specific judgments. previous work developed a test for a proposed alternative,that clinical judgment should systematically incorporate both general knowledge and patient-specific information. the test was derived from image theory's two phase-account of decision making and its simple counting rule
|
|
کلیدواژه
|
which describes how possible courses of action are pre-screened for compatibility with standards and values. The current paper applies this rule to clinical forecasting
|
|
آدرس
|
connecticut healthcare system,clinical epidemiology research center,950 campbell avenue,mailcode 151b,west haven,ct 06516, United States, state of connecticut,department of mental health and addiction services,southwest connecticut mental health system, United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|