|
|
Predicting biases in very highly educated samples: Numeracy and metacognition
|
|
|
|
|
نویسنده
|
ghazal s. ,cokely e.t. ,garcia-retamero r.
|
منبع
|
judgment and decision making - 2014 - دوره : 9 - شماره : 1 - صفحه:15 -34
|
چکیده
|
We investigated the relations between numeracy and superior judgment and decision making in two large community outreach studies in holland (n=5408). in these very highly educated samples (e.g.,30-50% held graduate degrees),the berlin numeracy test was a robust predictor of financial,medical,and metacognitive task performance (i.e.,lotteries,intertemporal choice,denominator neglect,and confidence judgments),independent of education,gender,age,and another numeracy assessment. metacognitive processes partially mediated the link between numeracy and superior performance. more numerate participants performed better because they deliberated more during decision making and more accurately evaluated their judgments (e.g.,less overconfidence). results suggest that well-designed numeracy tests tend to be robust predictors of superior judgment and decision making because they simultaneously assess (1) mathematical competency and (2) metacognitive and self-regulated learning skills. © 2013.
|
کلیدواژه
|
Cognitive abilities; Confidence; Dual systems; Individual differences; Judgment bias; Metacognition; Numeracy; Risk literacy; Superior decision making
|
آدرس
|
department of cognitive and learning sciences,michigan technological university, United States, department of cognitive and learning sciences,michigan technological university,united states,center for adaptive behavior and cognition,max planck institute for human development, Germany, center for adaptive behavior and cognition,max planck institute for human development,germany,department of psychology,university of granada, Spain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|