The tide that lifts all focal boats: Asymmetric predictions of ascent and descent in rankings

In six studies,we find evidence for an upward mobility bias,or a tendency to predict that a rise in ranking is more likely than a decline,even in domains where motivation or intention to rise play no role. although people cannot willfully change their height (study 1),and geographical entities cannot willfully alter their temperature (study 2),number of natural disasters (study 3),levels of precipitation (studies 4a and 4b),or chemical concentration (study 5),subjects believed that each is more likely to rise than drop in ranking. this bias is due to an association between a ranking’s order and the direction of absolute change,and to the tendency to give considerable weight to a focal agent over non-focal agents. because people generally expect change to be represented in terms of higher ranks,and because they tend to focus on specific,focal targets,they believe that any given target will experience a larger relative increase than other targets. we discuss implications for social policy. © 2016,society for judgment and decision making. all rights reserved.