|
|
|
|
It’s still bullshit: Reply to Dalton (2016)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
نویسنده
|
pennycook g. ,cheyne j.a. ,barr n. ,koehler d.j. ,fugelsang j.a.
|
|
منبع
|
judgment and decision making - 2016 - دوره : 11 - شماره : 1 - صفحه:123 -125
|
|
چکیده
|
In reply to dalton (2016),we argue that bullshit is defined in terms of how it is produced,not how it is interpreted. we agree that it can be interpreted as profound by some readers (and assumed as much in the original paper). nonetheless,we present additional evidence against the possibility that more reflective thinkers are more inclined to interpret bullshit statements as profound. © 2016,society for judgment and decision making. all rights reserved.
|
|
کلیدواژه
|
Bullshit; Intention; Meaning
|
|
آدرس
|
department of psychology,university of waterloo,200 university avenue west,waterloo,on n2l 3g1, Canada, department of psychology,university of waterloo, Canada, the school of humanities and creativity,sheridan college, Canada, department of psychology,university of waterloo, Canada, department of psychology,university of waterloo, Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|