Dual processes and moral conflict: Evidence for deontological reasoners’ intuitive utilitarian sensitivity

The prominent dual process model of moral cognition suggests that reasoners intuitively detect that harming others is wrong (deontological system-1 morality) but have to engage in demanding deliberation to realize that harm can be acceptable depending on the consequences (utilitarian system-2 morality). but the nature of the interaction between the processes is not clear. to address this key issue we tested whether deontological reasoners also intuitively grasp the utilitarian dimensions of classic moral dilemmas. in three studies subjects solved moral dilemmas in which utilitarian and deontological considerations cued conflicting or non-conflicting decisions while performing a demanding concurrent load task. results show that reasoners’ sensitivity to conflictingmoral perspectives,as reflected in decreased decision confidence and increased experienced processing difficulty,was unaffected by cognitive load. we discuss how these findings argue for a hybrid dual process model interpretation in which system-1 cues both a deontological and utilitarian intuition. © 2017,society for judgment and decision making. all rights reserved.