|
|
optimization of reconstruction and quantification of motion-corrected coronary pet-ct
|
|
|
|
|
نویسنده
|
doris mhairi k. ,otaki yuka ,krishnan sandeep k. ,kwiecinski jacek ,rubeaux mathieu ,alessio adam ,pan tinsu ,cadet sebastien ,dey damini ,dweck marc r. ,newby david e. ,berman daniel s. ,slomka piotr j.
|
منبع
|
journal of nuclear cardiology - 2020 - دوره : 27 - شماره : 2 - صفحه:494 -504
|
چکیده
|
Coronary pet shows promise in the detection of high-risk atherosclerosis, but there remains a need to optimize imaging and reconstruction techniques. we investigated the impact of reconstruction parameters and cardiac motion-correction in 18f sodium fluoride (18f-naf) pet. twenty-two patients underwent 18f-naf pet within 22 days of an acute coronary syndrome. optimal reconstruction parameters were determined in a subgroup of six patients. motion-correction was performed on ecg-gated data of all patients with optimal reconstruction. tracer uptake was quantified in culprit and reference lesions by computing signal-to-noise ratio (snr) in diastolic, summed, and motion-corrected images. reconstruction using 24 subsets, 4 iterations, point-spread-function modelling, time of flight, and 5-mm post-filtering provided the highest median snr (31.5) compared to 4 iterations 0-mm (22.5), 8 iterations 0-mm (21.1), and 8 iterations 5-mm (25.6; all p < .05). motion-correction improved snr of culprit lesions (n = 33) (24.5[19.9-31.5]) compared to diastolic (15.7[12.4-18.1]; p < .001) and summed data (22.1[18.9-29.2]; p < .001). motion-correction increased the snr difference between culprit and reference lesions (10.9[6.3-12.6]) compared to diastolic (6.2[3.6-10.3]; p = .001) and summed data (7.1 [4.8-11.6]; p = .001). the number of iterations and extent of post-filtering has marked effects on coronary 18f-naf pet quantification. cardiac motion-correction improves discrimination between culprit and reference lesions.
|
کلیدواژه
|
atherosclerosis ,positron emission tomography ,cardiac motion ,computed tomography
|
آدرس
|
university of edinburgh, bhf centre for cardiovascular science, clinical research imaging centre, edinburgh heart centre, uk. cedars-sinai medical center, department of imaging and medicine and biomedical sciences, usa, cedars-sinai medical center, department of imaging and medicine and biomedical sciences, usa, cedars-sinai medical center, department of imaging and medicine and biomedical sciences, usa, university of edinburgh, bhf centre for cardiovascular science, clinical research imaging centre, edinburgh heart centre, uk. cedars-sinai medical center, department of imaging and medicine and biomedical sciences, usa, cedars-sinai medical center, department of imaging and medicine and biomedical sciences, usa, university of washington, department of radiology, usa, the university of texas, md anderson cancer center, department of imaging physics, usa, cedars-sinai medical center, department of imaging and medicine and biomedical sciences, usa, cedars-sinai medical center, department of imaging and medicine and biomedical sciences, usa, university of edinburgh, bhf centre for cardiovascular science, clinical research imaging centre, edinburgh heart centre, uk, university of edinburgh, bhf centre for cardiovascular science, clinical research imaging centre, edinburgh heart centre, uk, cedars-sinai medical center, department of imaging and medicine and biomedical sciences, usa, cedars-sinai medical center, department of imaging and medicine and biomedical sciences, usa. artificial intelligence in medicine program, usa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|