>
Fa   |   Ar   |   En
   Fetal cell-free DNA fraction in maternal plasma is affected by fetal trisomy  
   
نویسنده Suzumori Nobuhiro ,Ebara Takeshi ,Yamada Takahiro ,Samura Osamu ,Yotsumoto Junko ,Nishiyama Miyuki ,Miura Kiyonori ,Sawai Hideaki ,Murotsuki Jun ,Kitagawa Michihiro ,Kamei Yoshimasa ,Masuzaki Hideaki ,Hirahara Fumiki ,Saldivar Juan-Sebastian ,Dharajiya Nilesh ,Sago Haruhiko ,Sekizawa Akihiko
منبع journal of human genetics - 2016 - دوره : 61 - شماره : 7 - صفحه:647 -652
چکیده    The purpose of this noninvasive prenatal testing (nipt) study was to compare the fetal fraction of singleton gestations by gestational age, maternal characteristics and chromosome-specific aneuploidies as indicated by z-scores. this study was a multicenter prospective cohort study. test data were collected from women who underwent nipt by the massively parallel sequencing method. we used sequencing-based fetal fraction calculations in which we estimated fetal dna fraction by simply counting the number of reads aligned within specific autosomal regions and applying a weighting scheme derived from a multivariate model. relationships between fetal fractions and gestational age, maternal weight and height, and z-scores for chromosomes 21, 18 and 13 were assessed. a total of 7740 pregnant women enrolled in the study, of which 6993 met the study criteria. as expected, fetal fraction was inversely correlated with maternal weight (p<0.001). the median fetal fraction of samples with euploid result (n=6850) and trisomy 21 (n=70) were 13.7% and 13.6%, respectively. in contrast, the median fetal fraction values for samples with trisomies 18 (n=35) and 13 (n=9) were 11.0% and 8.0%, respectively. the fetal fraction of samples with trisomy 21 nipt result is comparable to that of samples with euploid result. however, the fetal fractions of samples with trisomies 13 and 18 are significantly lower compared with that of euploid result. we conclude that it may make detecting these two trisomies more challenging.
آدرس Japan NIPT consortium, Japan. Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japan, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Japan NIPT consortium, Japan. Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japan, Japan NIPT consortium, Japan. The Jikei University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japan, Japan NIPT consortium, Japan. Ochanomizu University, Department of Genetic Counseling, Japan, Japan NIPT consortium, Japan. National Center for Child Health and Development, Japan, Japan NIPT consortium, Japan. Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japan, Japan NIPT consortium, Japan. Hyogo College of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japan, Japan NIPT consortium, Japan. Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Japan, Japan NIPT consortium, Japan. Sanno Hospital, Japan, Japan NIPT consortium, Japan. Saitama Medical University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japan, Japan NIPT consortium, Japan. Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japan, Japan NIPT consortium, Japan. Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japan, Sequenom Laboratories, USA, Sequenom Laboratories, USA, Japan NIPT consortium, Japan. National Center for Child Health and Development, Japan, Japan NIPT consortium, Japan. Showa University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japan
 
     
   
Authors
  
 
 

Copyright 2023
Islamic World Science Citation Center
All Rights Reserved