Survival Rate of Resin and Ceramic Inlays,Onlays,and Overlays: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the survival rate of ceramic and resin inlays,onlays,and overlays and to identify the complication types associated with the main clinical outcomes. two reviewers searched pubmed,embase,and the cochrane central register of controlled trials for articles published between 1983 through april 2015,conforming to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines for systematic reviews. clinical studies meeting the following criteria were included: 1) studies related to resin and ceramic inlays,onlays,and overlays; 2) prospective,retrospective,or randomized controlled trials conducted in humans; 3) studies with a dropout rate of less than 30%; and 4) studies with a follow-up longer than 5 y. of 1,389 articles,14 met the inclusion criteria. the meta-regression indicated that the type of ceramic material (feldspathic porcelain vs. glass-ceramic),study design (retrospective vs. prospective),follow-up time (5 vs. 10 y),and study setting (university vs. private clinic) did not affect the survival rate. estimated survival rates for glass-ceramics and feldspathic porcelain were between 92% and 95% at 5 y (n = 5,811 restorations) and were 91% at 10 y (n = 2,154 restorations). failures were related to fractures/chipping (4%),followed by endodontic complications (3%),secondary caries (1%),debonding (1%),and severe marginal staining (0%). odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) were 0.19 (0.04 to 0.96) and 0.54 (0.17 to 1.69) for pulp vitality and type of tooth involved (premolars vs. molars),respectively. ceramic inlays,onlays,and overlays showed high survival rates at 5 y and 10 y,and fractures were the most frequent cause of failure. © international & american associations for dental research.