how does a shared decision-making (sdm) intervention for oncologists affect participation style and preference matching in patients with breast and colon cancer?

The aims of this study are to assess patients’ preferred and perceived decision-making roles and preference matching in a sample of german breast and colon cancer patients and to investigate how a shared decision-making (sdm) intervention for oncologists influences patients’ preferred and perceived decision-making roles and the attainment of preference matches. this study is a post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial (rct) on the effects of an sdm intervention. the sdm intervention was a 12-h sdm training program for physicians in combination with decision board use. for this study, we analysed a subgroup of 107 breast and colon cancer patients faced with serious treatment decisions who provided data on specific questionnaires with regard to their preferred and perceived decision-making roles (passive, sdm or active). patients filled in questionnaires immediately following a decision-relevant consultation (t1) with their oncologist. eleven of these patients’ 27 treating oncologists had received the sdm intervention within the rct. a majority of cancer patients (60%) preferred sdm. a match between preferred and perceived decision-making roles was reached for 72% of patients. the patients treated by sdm-trained physicians perceived greater autonomy in their decision making (p < 0.05) with more patients perceiving sdm or an active role, but their preference matching was not influenced. a sdm intervention for oncologists boosted patient autonomy but did not improve preference matching. this highlights the already well-known reluctance of physicians to engage in explicit role clarification. trial registration: german clinical trials register drks00000539; funding source: german cancer aid.