combination low carbohydrate, high fat diet and physical activity intervention on lipoprotein-lipids in type 2 diabetics

Background]with atherosclerosis first being demonstrated to be as a result of diet in 1909, epidemiological studies have examined the role of diet on cardiovascular disease (cvd). this has led to diet’s inclusion as a secondary cvd risk factor not only for its direct association with cvd, but also due to its important role to play in other risk factors, such as dyslipidemia and diabetes mellitus. the low carbohydrate, high fat diet (lchfd) is a contentious topic. its efficacy is muchdebated, with opponents proposing that lchfds increase the risk of developing cvd.[objectives]this study’s aim was to determine if a lchfd alters lipoproteinlipids, either unaccompanied or in combination with physical activity in individuals with type 2 diabetes.[methods]participants (n = 39) were allocated to either 16 weeks of simultaneous physical activity and lchfd (diexg), lchfd only (dietg) or 16 weeks of blind control (cong). participants in the diexg were required to eat a high fat diet and not more than 50 g of carbohydrates per day in addition to walking a minimum of 10,000 steps daily. the dietg too followed a lchfd but were not prescribed any physical activity while the cong continued with their normal daily activities. data were analyzed by spss 25 software using a paired sample ttest and anova. a confidence level of p lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant.[results]no significant (p gt; 0.05) changes were observed in blood total cholesterol (tc), triglycerides (tg), lowdensity lipoprotein cholesterol (ldlc) and highdensity lipoprotein cholesterol (hdlc) in either the diexg (tc: p = 0.791; 2.0% increase, tg: p = 0.477; 9.5% decrease, ldlc: p = 0.704; 7.4% increase and hdlc: p = 0.989; 0% change) or dietg (tc: p = 0.881; 0% change, tg: p = 0.677; 17.9% increase, ldlc: p = 0.744; 13.8% decrease and hdlc: p = 0.844; 0% change).[conclusions]it appears that a lchfd with or without physical activity does not have any benefit on lipoproteinlipids in type 2 diabetics, and may actually result in unfavorable, albeit insignificant, adaptations.