فرآیندها و روش‌های مشارکتی به‌کاررفته در معماری مسکونی: یک مرور سیستماتیک

رویکرد مشارکتی در دوران کنونی یک رویکرد تثبیت شده از حیث نظری است و کاربردهای بسیاری نیز در حوزه عمل دارد. معماری (و طراحی) مشارکتی نیز گرایشی آزموده و واجد موفقیت ها و دستاوردهای متعدد است. اما همچنان سوالات و چالش های زیادی پیرامون آن وجود دارد. از جمله پرسش های مهم دربارۀ مشارکت، چگونگی انتخاب فعالیت و روش مشارکتی از میان گزینه های متنوع، چگونگی پیاده سازی و میزان موثر بودن روش های مشارکتی می باشند. هدف پژوهش حاضر گزارش و بررسی این روش ها و فرآیندهای مشارکتی از طریق مرور سیستماتیک منابع مرتبط است. در پایان از ترکیب نتایج به دست آمده، یک فرآیند مشارکتی برای معماری مسکونی در چهار گام معرفی و آشنایی، بررسی وضع موجود، طراحی، و بازبینی و اصلاح همراه فعالیت های قدم به قدم آن پیشنهاد شده است. روایی و پایایی پژوهش با کمک دو فرد متخصص و از طریق پرسشنامۀ دوارزشی کنترل شد که در آن ضریب کاپای کوهن 0/744 در سطح معناداری 0/011 به دست آمد.

participation methods and processes in residential architecture: a systematic review

participation is a well-established approach across various academic and pragmatic fields, including architecture and design, supported by robust theoretical and practical foundations. despite its proven merits and successes, it continues to face critical questions and challenges, particularly concerning the techniques, methods, and processes involved. key issues include the extensive range of reported techniques and methods, the criteria for selecting appropriate approaches, implementation considerations, and the suitability and effectiveness of participation regarding these issues, and as an initial step, this study employs a systematic review methodology to collect and analyze recent literature on participation techniques, methods, and processes, providing designers with insights into selecting suitable approaches for participatory projects in residential architecture. as a result, a four-stage participatory process is proposed integrating selected findings, which is appropriate for residential projects. the validity and reliability of the study were assessed by two experts using a dichotomous questionnaire, yielding a cohen rsquo;s kappa coefficient of 0.744 at a significance level of 0.011 this study compiles data from articles indexed in scopus and web of science between 2000 and 2025, using the keywords participatory design, participatory planning, urban participation, participation tools, and participation methods in titles or abstracts. a total of 4,128 articles were identified, from which 167 duplicates were removed, leaving 3,961 articles for review. after screening titles, abstracts, and conclusions, 3,374 unrelated papers were excluded. the remaining 587 articles were fully reviewed and prioritized based on their relevance to the study rsquo;s aim, e.g., the scale and use of the reported project, or if the paper directly reports the methods and techniques used in the project. this phase yielded 72 final selections. from these 72 articles, 55 participation methods and techniques mdash;each with varying implementations mdash;were identified, alongside six distinct participation processes. these findings provide a foundation for designing effective participatory architecture processes by appropriately integrating selected techniques, methods, and processes within a participatory framework drawing from this data, a four-stage participatory process is proposed: (1) getting to know, (2) current situation assessment, (3) design, and (4) feedback and modification. the first stage focuses on understanding the people and their environment and establishing trust and cooperation between locals and architects/researchers. the second stage employs a sorting task to reflect and analyze the house's spatial and functional aspects, identifying both favorable and problematic qualities. in the third stage, a location task and insights from the previous stage help participants arrange different spaces in an imagined house. this step can be enhanced using 1 m sup2; square or small-scale furniture models, aiding participants in comprehending spatial dimensions and household tasks. next, the architectural design of the house is completed by the architect/researcher based on the drafts and decisions of the third stage. the final stage is for presenting the completed design to participants for their feedback, refinement, and modification, utilizing both 3d modeling and physical prototypes. this structured approach provides a sound framework for participatory design, ensuring both active user involvement in shaping architectural spaces and quality residential architecture for users.