واکاوی تاریخ‌گرایی در کتب تالیفی دهۀ 80 ه.ش. حوزۀ معماری معاصر ایران

موضوع پژوهش، پردازش تاریخ‌گرایی در معماری معاصر ایران است. نشانه‌های تاریخی در معماری، بارزترین مشخصۀ تاریخ‌گرایی در حوزۀ معاصر است. سوال پژوهش «چگونگی نمود تاریخ همچنین نشانه‌های تاریخ‌گرایی در دوره بندی های تالیفات معماری معاصر؟» و فرضیه «عینیت یافتن نشانه‌های تاریخی همچنین امکان دوره بندی آثار معاصر بر اساس شاخصه‌های تاریخ‌گرایی» هستند. پژوهش پس از پردازش مفاهیم تاریخ‌گرایی و جایگاهش در تالیفات، الگویی برای بررسی آثار ارائه می‌دهد. پژوهش کیفی است با راهبرد تفسیری که با روش تاریخی- انتقادی پس‌زمینۀ تاریخِ معماری را بازنمائی و با استفاده از فرایند تاریخ‌گرایی هِگِل که از روش‌های تحقیق تاریخی است، دوره بندی های معاصر را ارزیابی کرده و پس از استنتاج مدلی 3 گانه برای تاریخ‌گرایی، در راستای پاسخ به سوالات تحقیق برمی‌آید. نتیجه اینکه، مجموعاً شش نوع دوره بندی در تالیفات دهۀ 80 هجری شمسی قابل‌استخراج است. پنج اثر تالیفی تاریخ‌گرایی سمبولیک و تنها یک اثر تاریخ‌گرایی فلسفی دارند.

historicism in the contemporary iranian architectural compilation books during 2000s

the subject of this research is the processing of historicism in the contemporary iranian architectural works. historical signs in architecture are the most prominent features of historicism in the contemporary context. this research begins with the question “how historicism is presented in contemporary architectural works?&. it is assumed that history in contemporary architecture has presented itself with objective and subjective elements and has been crystallized in different ways. also, the contemporary iranian architectural works with a rich history of ancient architecture, are not exception for the acceptance of history in the contemporary world. moreover, assuming that historicist practices allow the historical classification of the contemporary iranian architectural compilations, these compilations must inevitably be placed in the identification model of the type of historicism.after processing the concept of historicism and periodization, the research provides a model for studying the works. based on the views of hegel and other architectural theorists such as alan colquhoun, this model classifies historicism into three types (classical historicism, symbolic historicism, and philosophical). colquhoun believes: historicism can be used for three things: the first one is an approach; the second is an artistic practice and the third is a theory of history. attention to history leads to the emergence of historicism as a perceptible and analyzing process. a concept that, in a particularly, influential way in hegel’s philosophy, was found to be its clear and influential scheme and continued with various narratives in the next philosophical schools. moreover, examining the periodization method of each work in the 2000s, this research conducts a thematic categorization and proceeds through the hegelian historicism process, which is a method of doing historical research. “periodization” is the separation of works and events in the form of occasional categories and styles. “periodization” is a historical view and an attempt to express the “zeitgeist”, also is one of the main tools of historical studies. but using this tool has its own difficulties. historical periodization, for historians, is a frequent controversy that implies the necessity of an agreement and often appears as a historic event. analysis of the common periods and types of historicism is another aspect of this research for answering the research questions.this research is of qualitative type with an interpretive strategy that reflects the historical context of the architecture of iran through a historical-critical approach. the selected case studies include contemporary iranian architectural compilation works of the 2000s, which include a total of eight books attempting to determine the periodicity of the contemporary iranian architectural works in various ways.the results of this paper show that historicism evaluated in the architectural works in the 2000s can be classified into six categories. in the study of various types of historicism, it was also found that there have been no compilations of classical historicism. in five works, symbolic historicism, and only in one book, philosophical historicism has been the criterion for determining the periodicity of the contemporary architectural works. there have been no signs of historicism in three works.