بررسی تاثیر «نوع نحو فضا» بر «میزان اجتماع‌پذیری» مراکز اجتماعی از منظر فلسفه اخلاقی «رو-در-روییِ» لویناس

تشدید روزمرگی و کاهش حیات اجتماعی، توجه به بستر مناسب برای حضور طیف وسیعی از گروه‏های مختلف اجتماعی در طراحی فضاهای عمومی را ضروری می‌سازد. هدف تحقیق کشف کیفیات فرمی است که در طراحی مرکز اجتماعی بتواند کیفیت اجتماع‌پذیری فضا را افزایش دهد. برای پرداختن به این هدف، لویناس به‌عنوان فیلسوفی مطرح در حوزۀ اخلاق در کنار نظریات تخصصی مطرح در معماری و شهرسازی انتخاب‌شده است. در این راستا، پس از شناسایی مولفه‌های اجتماع‌پذیری و نحو فضا، مبتنی بر موافق و غیر موافق با دیدگاه لویناس سه سناریو مختلف از مولفه‌های نحو ‏فضا در محیط مجازی طراحی شد. سپس داده‏ها در سطح ترتیبی از میان گروهی که در سناریو‏های مجازی پیمایش کرده‏اند جمع‌آوری و با نرم‌افزار spss تحلیل شدند. نتایج نشان می دهد سناریوی دارای کیفیات ارتجال، پیچیدگی، بی‌نظمی و کنترل ناپذیری، ظرفیت بیشتری برای اجتماع‌پذیری موردنظر لویناس در طراحی مرکز اجتماعی دارند.

the effect of type of space syntax on socialization of social centers from the perspective of levinas’s face-to-face moral philosophy

one of the problems of today is the separation of different social groups from one another and is disregard to ignore different social layers. weakness that has the effect of increasing day-to-day living and reducing social life and communal ethics. the present study, using levinas’s philosophy that emphasizes one’s face-to-face with another, offers a kind of ethical phenomenology. what sort of spatiality can levinas’s desired socialization in design a social center to meet?the basis of ethics in levinas’s philosophy is the asymmetry of the moral relation between subjects and the prohibition of any moral debt. in a relationship asymmetry, not all matters are subject to the same principles and tasks. an infinite notion of the other is a model for the subject’s right relationship with another and creates a countless sense of responsibility for him. face-to-face with another human being is a rebirth and an unpredictable and transcendent experience for him. this face-to-face, if confronted visage-to-visage, which is inherently peaceful and friendly, leads to dialogue, to the teaching of reason, and to the community that levinas is considering. finally, general issues raised by levinas’s face-to-face thinking include intuitive perception, being evasive, and asymmetrically intersubjective.attention to the relationships and interactions of different social groups is essential to understanding individual, social, and preternatural concerns and needs for growth and prosperity. the purpose of the research is to approach design qualities that incorporate them into social centers to enable interactions with daily life for a wider community. in this regard, the components of socialization as a dependent variable and the components of syntax as independent change are reviewed and based on levinas’s ethical perspective, three different scenarios of syntax components are designed in the virtual environment. then, by formulating an observation and interviewing program based on the components of socialization, the data were collected at the sequential level from the group that navigated the virtual scenarios. they were analyzed by spss software using one-way anova and tukey tests. to construct scenarios, the syntax components include &relevance&, &cohesion&, &depth&, &choice& and &control&. the use of scenario building is based on the experience of lange 3, which in its research for a possible future change of the current status of a pavement in a rural landscape, provides three scenarios of agriculture, recreation, and nature conservation as a virtual model and animates the participants. finally, explored participants’ viewpoints for their research on how to prepare and deliver simulations for stakeholder engagement (longe longe, 2017).the results show that applying the formative qualities in scenario 3, which has been attempted to be most consistent with levinas’s thought, can be efficient in enhancing the socialization of space. scenario 1 also managed to gain some of the second ranks, but scenario 2 is not recommended for sociable spaces. thus, it turns out that a scenario in which the qualities of transactionality, complexity, and ease of use, disorder, and uncontrollability have been used, have greater potential for levinas’s desired socialization in social center designs.