|
|
مفهوم استقلال در روابط بینالملل: بررسی موردی سیاست روسیه در مورد کشورهای مستقل همسود
|
|
|
|
|
نویسنده
|
خانی محمد حسن ,سرهنگ پور پوریا
|
منبع
|
مطالعات اوراسياي مركزي - 1403 - دوره : 17 - شماره : 1 - صفحه:107 -129
|
چکیده
|
در دوران معاصر، دولتهای مستقل بر پایۀ حاکمیت وستفالیایی به عنوان بازیگران اصلی و تعیینکننده در عرصۀ بینالمللی شناخته میشوند. پایههای وستفالیایی به طور سنتی، بر استقلال مطلق دولتها در قلمرو خود و مداخله نکردن دیگران تاکید دارد. با این حال، تحلیلهای نظری نشان میدهد که دولتها بسیار کم از این استقلال مطلق برخوردارند و همواره منافع ملی خود را در چارچوب روابط و فشارهای بینالمللی بازشناسی میکنند. این پژوهش با هدف بررسی تحولات تاریخی اساسی مانند جهانیشدن، پایان جنگ سرد و فروپاشی گروهبندی شرق، به دنبال آن است که تاثیر این رویدادها را بر مفهوم استقلال و سیاست خارجی دولتها تحلیل کند. در این زمینه، پژوهش بهطور ویژه بر سیاست خارجی روسیه در مورد کشورهای استقلالیافته از اتحاد شوروی تمرکز دارد. پرسش اصلی پژوهش این است که: چگونه تغییر در مفهوم استقلال، بر سیاست خارجی روسیه تاثیر گذاشته است؟ روش پژوهش استفاده شده از نوع کیفی با رویکرد توصیفی - تحلیلی است و گردآوری دادهها با استفاده از اسناد و منابع کتابخانهای انجام پذیرفته است.
|
کلیدواژه
|
استقلال، سیاست خارجی، جهانیشدن، روسیه، کشورهای مستقل همسود
|
آدرس
|
دانشگاه امام صادق (ع), دانشکده معارف اسلامی و علوم سیاسی, گروه روابط بینالملل و مطالعات منطقهای, ایران, دانشگاه امام صادق (ع), دانشکدۀ معارف اسلامی و علوم سیاسی, ایران
|
پست الکترونیکی
|
pouria.sarhangpour@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the concept of independence in international relations, a case study of russian policy towards cis countries
|
|
|
Authors
|
khani mohammad hassan ,sarhangpour pouria
|
Abstract
|
introduction: in the contemporary era, independent states, whose most obvious feature is westphalian sovereignty, form the core of the international system. these states are characterized by the principle of non-interference in their internal affairs and a formal equality with other states, regardless of size, power, or wealth. this state concept, which has its roots in the 1648 “peace of westphalia” continues to shape international relations by emphasizing the legal and political independence of states. as a result, states continue to see themselves as the main actors in this system, interacting on the basis of mutual recognition and formal equality. however, the realities of the international system, especially in the post-cold war era, show that the practical application of sovereignty is often far from this theoretical ideal. our goal in this article is to critically evaluate the concept of independence as manifested in moscow’s foreign policy toward commonwealth of independent states (cis). following the dissolution of the soviet union, the creation of the cis was intended to provide a framework for cooperation for the newly independent states while maintaining some degree of connection with russia. however, the nature of this relationship has raised important questions about the actual extent of sovereignty that these countries enjoy. this study examines how russia’s foreign policy has maintained a delicate balance between its strategic interests and the autonomy of these countries, assessing whether moscow genuinely respects their independence or seeks to maintain its sphere of influence in the region. a key aspect of this analysis is the historical context that has shaped the relationship between russia and the cis countries. the legacy of the soviet union, along with russia’s perception of itself as a regional hegemon, continues to influence its approach to these nations. many of the cis countries, while formally independent, have inherited deep political, economic, and security ties with moscow. over the years, russia has used these connections to exert influence, raising concerns about whether these countries can fully exercise their sovereignty without interference. this historical background is crucial for understanding the dynamics of modern russian foreign policy toward the cis and the enduring tensions surrounding the concept of independence.the consequences of moscow’s policies for regional stability and international relations are another important area of investigation. russia’s approach to the cis has often caused tensions with both the cis countries and foreign powers, especially the west. by maintaining a sphere of influence, moscow has contributed to conflicts and frozen disputes in regions like georgia, ukraine, and moldova, where aspirations for greater autonomy and closer ties with the west conflict with russian interests. this study will examine how russia’s foreign policy affects not only the domestic dynamics of the cis member states but also broader geopolitical relations, including the role of international organizations such as the european union and nato.this research seeks to determine the extent to which russian foreign policy aligns with or undermines the autonomy of cis member states. while moscow often presents itself as respecting the independence of these countries, its actions often suggest otherwise. by critically examining these policies and their effects, the study aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of the complex relationship between russia and the cis, providing insights into the broader issue of state sovereignty in a world where power dynamics are increasingly interdependent. this assessment will provide a clearer picture of whether russia’s engagement with the cis promotes true independence or perpetuates a new form of dependence that challenges the traditional concept of state sovereignty.
|
Keywords
|
independence ,foreign policy ,globalization ,russia ,commonwealth of independent states
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|