نقدِ نگاهِ اسطوره ای در شعرِ مهدی اَخَوانِ ثالث

اﺧﻮان ﺛﺎﻟﺚ را ﻧﻤﯽﺗﻮان ﺑﯿﺮون از ﻫﻨﺪﺳﻪای ﮐﻪ ﺟﻬﺎن اﺳﻄﻮرهای ﺑﺮای او ﺗﺮﺳﯿﻢ ﻣﯽﮐﻨﺪ، ﺗﺼﻮّر ﮐﺮد. آن اﻧﺪازهای ﮐﻪ اﻧﺪﯾﺸﻪی اﺳﻄﻮرهای اﺳﺒﺎب آﺷﻨﺎﯾﯽزداﯾﯽﻫﺎ و ﻓﺮم را در ﺷﻌﺮ او ﺑﻨﯿﺎد ﻧﻬﺎده اﺳﺖ، ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎن ﻣﯿﺰان ﻧﯿﺰ ﭘﯽرﯾﺰ آن ﻧﻘﺎط آﺳﯿﺐزاﯾﯽ ﺷﺪه ﮐﻪ از آن درﯾﭽﻪ ﻣﯽﺗﻮان ﺑﺎ ذﻫﻨﯿّﺖ و زﺑﺎن ﺷﺎﻋﺮ روﺷﻦﻓﮑﺮﻫﺎی اﯾﺮاﻧﯽ، ﻧﻘﺒﯽ ﺑﻪﺳﻮی اﻣﺘﻨﺎع ﺗﻌﻘّﻞ ﻣﺪرن زد. اﺧﻮان در ﺷﺎﻫﮑﺎرﻫﺎی ﺧﻮد، زﻣﺴﺘﺎن، آﺧﺮ ﺷﺎﻫﻨﺎﻣﻪ و از اﯾﻦ اوﺳﺘﺎ، ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪای از ﺳﺎﺣﺖ اﻧﺪﯾﺸﻪی اﺳﻄﻮرهای ﭘﺎی ﻧﻬﺎده ﮐﻪ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺎنﮔﺮاﯾﯽ و ﻣﻮﺳﯿﻘﯽ، ﻗﺪّﯾﺲﭘﻨﺪاری و اﻫﺮﯾﻤﻦﺳﺎزی، ﻏﻢ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ و ﮔﺮﯾﻪ ﺑﺮ رﺑﻊ و اﻃﻼل و دﻣﻦ، آن ﻫﻢ در ﻋﺼﺮ آه و آﻫﻦ و آﻫﮏ زﻧﺪه، راه را ﺑﺮ ﻫﺮ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪی ﺗﺎرﯾﺦ ﻫﻢزﻣﺎﻧﯽای ﻣﺴﺪود ﮐﺮده اﺳﺖ. ﻧﮕﺎرﻧﺪه در اﯾﻦ ﺟﺴﺘﺎر، ﺑﺎ ﻋﻄﻒ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﻪ اﻧﺪﯾﺸﻤﻨﺪان ﻋﺼﺮ روﺷﻨﮕﺮی، ﺳﻌﯿﺶ ﺑﺮ آن ﺑﻮده ﮐﻪ ﺑﺎ ﭘﯿﺶ ﮐﺸﯿﺪن ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎﯾﯽ ﻋﯿﻨﯽ، ﻣﯿﺮاث ﻫﻨﺮی اﺧﻮان ﺛﺎﻟﺚ را ازﻣﻨﻈﺮی آﺳﯿﺐﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻧﻪ در ﭘﺮﺗﻮ ﺗﻔﮑّﺮ اﺳﻄﻮرهای، ﺑﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺧﻮﯾﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺤﺚ و ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ ﺑﮕﺬارد.

critique of the mythical thought in mehdi akhavan sales’ poetry

 introductionakhavan sales’s poetry cannot be appreciated out of the conceptual framework which the mythological world has drawn for him. as much as the mythical thought has acted as a means of defamiliarization and thus constituted the form of his poetry, it has also laid the foundations for those harmful points, through these harms, the weakness of mentality and language of iranian poet-intellectuals in understanding modern rationality is revealed. akhavan, in his masterpieces such as zemestan (winter), akhare-shahnameh (the end of shahnameh, and az in avesta (from this avesta), has set foot in an area of mythological realm, where archeology and music, sanctification and demonization, nostalgia, etc., have blocked the way for any experience of historical contemporaneity.