اعتبارسنجی روایت مواجهۀ امام سجاد(ع) با یزید

براساس روایات و شواهد تاریخی امام سجاد(ع) در روزگار خود توانست بعد از واقعۀ عاشورا به بهترین شکل، نظام تشیع را رهبری کند. این مقاله که بر روش توصیفی‌تحلیلی استوار است، به بررسی روایت مواجهۀ امام سجاد(ع) با یزید پرداخته و سند و محتوای حدیث را بررسی کرده است. نویسندگان به این نتیجه دست یافته‌اند که روایت مواجهۀ امام با یزید یا فرمانده منسوب به یزید، همان‌طور که مضمون آن در منابع تاریخی نقل شده است، به‌صورت نقل به معنا نقل گردیده است و نه‌تنها محتوای روایت مردود نیست، بلکه با واکاوی سند روایت و تتبع در قراین نقلی و بررسی دلالت متن روایت و توجه به مبنای متقدمان در گزینش و قبول حدیث و شرایط شیعیان در عصر صدور روایت دریافت می‌گردد که امکان وقوع رویداد بدیهی بوده و از هرگونه استبعاد می‌تواند به دور باشد.

validation of the tradition of imam sajjād’s encounter with yazid

introduction according to the traditions and historical evidence, imam sajjād (as) was able to lead the shiite system in the best way after the ashūrā event. this article, which is based on the descriptive-analytical method, examines the tradition of imam sajjād’s encounter with yazid and examines the isnad and the content of the hadith. it has come to the conclusion that the tradition of the encounter of imam (as) with yazid or the commander attributed to yazid, as its content is narrated in historical sources. it has been narrated in the form of a quotation with meaning, and not only the content of the tradition is not rejected, but it can be received by analyzing the isnad of the tradition and tracking in the tradition evidences and examining the meaning of the text of the tradition and paying attention to the basis of the predecessors in the selection and acceptance of the hadith and the conditions of the shiites in the era of the issuance of the tradition. that the possibility of the occurrence of the event is obvious and can be far from any exclusion.the sunnah, which reflects the sayings, actions, taqrir and writings of the holy prophet (pbuh), is considered the second most important source of understanding religion after the qur’an. which has been spread to guide mankind until the resurrection. therefore, there is no escape from referring to the quran and sunnah in order to understand the teachings of islam. on the other hand, with a quick look at the events of the last fourteen centuries, it must be acknowledged that to what extent traditions have played roles in the formation of islamic sciences. this important thing was taken into consideration with the diligence and precision of the companions of the imams (as), and many of the traditions of the infallibles have been formed in the form of a series of isnads and reached us. but on the other hand, this precious heritage was mixed with falsehoods and fabricated hadiths due to the interference of sick thoughts and weak traditions or fake news to enter the number of traditions. (cf. nasiri, 1390, p. 25) although the extent of damage to the shiite traditional heritage due to the far-sightedness of the imams (as) and their leadership is far less than that of the sunni traditional heritage. however, it should be noted that these damages, however small, have entered the shiite traditional heritage for various reasons and need to be refined and criticized. based on this, validating and criticizing traditions is one of the necessary issues, which fortunately, special attention and positive steps have been taken by foreign thinkers. (cf. ibid., p. 32) one of those traditions which is the issue of the present article, and some give the possibility of its being fabricated, is the tradition of how imam sajjād (as) confronted yazid, which was given by kulayni in the rauḍah section. here we will evaluate this tradition.