|
|
|
|
ارزیابی و مقایسه مدل aquacrop و مدلهای هوشمند جهت پیشبینی عملکرد گندم (مطالعه موردی: شهرستانهای میاندوآب و مهاباد)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
نویسنده
|
شرفی میلاد ,بهمنش جواد ,رضاوردینژاد وحید ,صمدیان فرد سعید
|
|
منبع
|
دانش آب و هيدروليك - 1403 - دوره : 34 - شماره : 1 - صفحه:1 -18
|
|
چکیده
|
امروزه بیش از هر زمان دیگری افزایش تولید محصولات استراتژیک مانند گندم نیاز به استفاده صحیح از منابع آب دارد. مدل aquacrop یکی از مدلهای پویا و کاربرپسند بوده که توسط سازمان خواروبار جهانی فائو توسعه داده شده است. اما این مدل به پارامترهای ورودی نسبتاً زیادی نیاز داشته و در صورت وجود سناریوهای متعدد، مدلی وقت گیر می باشد. در تحقیق حاضر برای رفع این مشکل و توسعه مدلی با داده های ورودی کمتر، با استفاده از مدل های هوشمند شبکه عصبی مصنوعی (ann)، رگرسیون بردار پشتیبان (svr)و رگرسیون بردار پشتیبان هیبرید شده با الگوریتم بهینه سازی کرم شب تاب (svr-ffa)و با ایجاد 440 سناریو در 2 مزرعه عملکرد مدلaquacrop مقایسه گردید. مزارع 99westw2 و westw10 به ترتیب در شهرستان های میاندوآب و مهاباد واقع گردیده و عملکرد (ton ha^-1) 6.588 و (ton ha^-1) 5.05 را داشته اند. نتایج اجرای مدل ها با استفاده از 5 معیار مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. نتایج این تحقیق نشان داد که برای هر دو مزرعه 99westw2 و westw10 مدل svr-ffa3 توانست کم ترین میزان خطا را داشته باشد، به طوریکه برای شاخص عملکرد، مقدار rmse برای مزارع مذکور به ترتیب (ton ha^-1) 0.033 و (ton ha-1) 0.069 به دست آمد. مدل های svr و ann نیز پس از مدل svr-ffa توانستند عملکرد مناسبی را از خود نشان دهند. در نهایت مدل های هوشمند svr-ffa، svrو ann با وجود کمترین تعداد ورودی قادر به پیش بینی مقادیر عملکرد در کم ترین زمان و با بیش ترین دقت بوده اند. در هر حال، نتایج نشان داد هر چه ورودی های مدل ها کم تر شود، پیش بینی مدل ها نیز ضعیف تر خواهد بود.
|
|
کلیدواژه
|
کشاورزی پایدار، گندم، عملکرد محصول، aquacrop
|
|
آدرس
|
دانشگاه ارومیه, دانشکده کشاورزی, گروه مهندسی آب, ایران. , دانشگاه ارومیه, دانشکده کشاورزی, گروه مهندسی آب, ایران. , دانشگاه ارومیه, دانشکده کشاورزی, گروه مهندسی آب, ایران. , دانشگاه تبریز, دانشکده کشاورزی, گروه مهندسی آب, ایران.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
evaluation and comparison of aquacrop model and intelligent models to predict wheat yield (case study: miandoab and mahabad cities)
|
|
|
|
|
Authors
|
sharafi m ,behmanesh javad ,rezaversi nejad v ,samadian fard s
|
|
Abstract
|
background and objectives due to population growth and iran's location in arid and semi-arid regions of the world, the need for water and food has increased and as a result, the pressure on water and soil resources will be more than before. on the other hand, the risk of drying up lake urmia, which causes environmental problems in the region, requires macro-water planning for the region and the use of optimal cultivation pattern to deal with water scarcity. therefore, optimal use of water preserves water resources and increases the quality of products. today more than ever, increasing the production of strategic crops such as wheat requires the proper use of water resources. the main source of food for the iranian people is wheat and related products, and any action that increases the yield of wheat due to limited soil resources, especially water resources, is important and necessary at the same time. in recent years, significant advances have been made in modeling product growth and development using mechanical models. plant growth models are increasingly used in the analysis of agricultural systems and simulate the plant's response to growth factors using mathematical equations. the aquacrop model is one of the dynamic and user-friendly models developed by the fao. the aquacrop model receives information about farm, plant, soil, irrigation and climate, and ultimately predicts important parameters such as crop. wheat yield simulation allows efficient management and better planning under various environmental inputs such as soil and water. to achieve higher accuracy and less model error, field parameters must be properly calibrated by the model to achieve proper performance. also, calibration of the model, if not done correctly, causes a high error prediction by the model, which leads to incorrect management, water loss, plant drought and other cases. therefore, using a model that has accurate and close prediction to the aquacrop model and requires fewer input parameters is essential, which saves time, reduces costs and eliminates calibration errors. however, this model requires relatively large input parameters and is a time-consuming model in the presence of multiple scenarios.methodology in recent years, smart models have been able to show high accuracy and become reliable models. therefore, in the present study, to solve this problem and develop a model with less input data, using the ann, svr and svr-ffa intelligent models and creating 440 scenarios in 2 farms, the performance of the aquacrop model was compared 99westw2 farm which is located in miandoab city and has a yield of 6.588 (ton ha-1) and westw10 farm is located in mahabad city and has a yield of 5.05 (ton ha-1).findings the results of the model are performed using 5 evaluation criteria of correlation coefficient, root mean square error, nash-sutcliffe coefficient, wilmot's index of agreement and, mean absolute percentage error. the results of this study showed that for both 99westw2 and westw10 farms, the svr-ffa3 model could have the lowest error rate, so that for the yield index, the rmse value for the mentioned farms was 0.033 and 0.069 (ton ha-1), respectively. the use of three models svr, svr-ffa, and ann and their comparison with the aquacrop model to predict wheat yield has been done for the first time in this study. the svr model was able to show the highest accuracy after the svr-ffa model. for 99westw2 farm, it can reduce the error rate to 0.043 (ton ha-1) and for westw10 farm to 0.077 (ton ha-1) and show good performance. the ann model, after the svr model, was able to show acceptable accuracy. the ann model for 99westw2 farm was able to reduce the error rate to 0.123 (ton ha-1) and for westw10 farm to 0.094 (ton ha-1). finally, the ann model had a relatively higher error than the svr-ffa and svr models, respectively, and showed a relatively lower performance than the two models.
|
|
Keywords
|
aquaculture ,crop yield ,sustainable agriculture ,wheat
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|