ترنس‌ها از منظر روانشناسی و فقه امامیه

هدف از این پژوهش، اتخاذ رویکردی یکسان در سراسر جهان اسلام و جامعه جهانی است. در این پژوهش، با استفاده از روش‌های تحلیلی و توصیفی، ضمن بیان مفاد، مبانی، اهداف و دستاوردهای تحقیق پیرامون آموزه‌های اسلامی و علم روانشناسی، مواضع فقها و روانشناسان و وجوه اشتراک و افتراق آن‌ها و نقد دیدگاه‌های موافق و مخالف تغییر جنسیت به‌طور دقیق و موشکافانه مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. ادله ابرازی موافقان و مخالفان از جایگاه ویژه‌ای برخوردار است. در پایان، پس از بررسی و تبیین رویکرد فقهای مذاهب اسلامی و علمای علم روانشناسی نسبت به موضوع، یافته‌ها حاکی از آن است که احکام متفاوتی از ناحیه‌ی مذاهب مختلف اسلامی، از جمله جواز مطلق تا حرمت مطلق، در این خصوص شکل گرفته است. نظریه مختار نیز به این صورت است که مشروعیت تغییر جنسیت مشروط به منطبق بودن با واقعیات جامعه و ادله شرعی، علمی و عرفی است؛ این رویکرد در بسیاری از نظام‌های حقوقی و توسط حقوقدانان پذیرفته شده و دارای منفعت عقلائی و مشروع بوده و با عرف جامعه سازگار است. از این رو، جواز تغییر جنسیت تحت شرایط خاص و مشروط مورد پذیرش قرار گرفته است. نظریه‌های دیگر نیز به استدلال‌های عقلی و باورهای عرفی و کتاب و سنت که از نظر استدلالی محکمی ندارند، استناد نموده‌اند که از ناحیه شرع و علم رد شده است.

transgender individuals from the perspective of psychology and imami jurisprudence

the objective of this study is to establish a unified approach within both the islamic world and the global community. this study employs a descriptive-analytical method to examine the principles, objectives, and implications of gender transition in light of islamic teachings and psychological perspectives. by analyzing the views of jurists and psychologists, the study explores their points of agreement and divergence while critically evaluating both supportive and opposing perspectives. a thorough investigation reveals a spectrum of views, ranging from absolute endorsement to outright rejection, as well as intermediate positions. the arguments presented by both supporters and opponents hold considerable significance. ultimately, after reviewing and elucidating the perspectives of islamic jurists and psychological scholars, the findings indicate that islamic schools of thought have issued various rulings on this matter, ranging from absolute permissibility to absolute prohibition. the preferred stance of this study is that conditional legitimacy is the most appropriate view. this is justified based on its alignment with social realities, religious and scientific evidence, and customary practices. additionally, this perspective is consistent with medical knowledge and has been accepted by the majority of legal systems and jurists. it is deemed rational, legitimate, and more compatible with societal norms. therefore, gender transition is permissible under specific conditions and restrictions. other opposing views, due to their reliance on weak reasoning, traditional beliefs, and interpretations of religious texts that lack solid evidentiary support, are rejected from both a religious and scientific standpoint.the objective of this study is to establish a unified approach within both the islamic world and the global community. this study employs a descriptive-analytical method to examine the principles, objectives, and implications of gender transition in light of islamic teachings and psychological perspectives. by analyzing the views of jurists and psychologists, the study explores their points of agreement and divergence while critically evaluating both supportive and opposing perspectives. a thorough investigation reveals a spectrum of views, ranging from absolute endorsement to outright rejection, as well as intermediate positions. the arguments presented by both supporters and opponents hold considerable significance. ultimately, after reviewing and elucidating the perspectives of islamic jurists and psychological scholars, the findings indicate that islamic schools of thought have issued various rulings on this matter, ranging from absolute permissibility to absolute prohibition. the preferred stance of this study is that conditional legitimacy is the most appropriate view. this is justified based on its alignment with social realities, religious and scientific evidence, and customary practices. additionally, this perspective is consistent with medical knowledge and has been accepted by the majority of legal systems and jurists. it is deemed rational, legitimate, and more compatible with societal norms. therefore, gender transition is permissible under specific conditions and restrictions. other opposing views, due to their reliance on weak reasoning, traditional beliefs, and interpretations of religious texts that lack solid evidentiary support, are rejected from both a religious and scientific standpoint.