توسعۀ مدل راهبردهای استفاده از ظرفیت خیرین در توسعۀ زیرساخت‌های ورزش کشور

یکی از منابع مهم تامین منابع مالی برای توسعۀ زیرساخت های ورزش ظرفیت خیرین است؛ از این رو، هدف پژوهش حاضر شناسایی راهبردهای استفاده از ظرفیت خیرین در توسعۀ زیرساخت های ورزش کشور است. این پژوهش به روش کیفی انجام شد و برای تحلیل داده ها از روش تحلیل محتوای کیفی با استفاده از روش تحلیل مضمون استفاده شد که ماهیت اکتشافی دارد. نمونۀ آماری پژوهش حاضر شامل تعدادی از خیرین فعال در حوزۀ ورزش، مدیران ارشد ورزشی و اساتید دانشگاهی صاحب‌نظر در این حوزه است. نمونه گیری به دو روش نمونه گیری هدفمند و نمونه گیری گلوله برفی انجام شد و با 23 مصاحبه به اشباع نظری رسید. به ‌منظور گردآوری اطلاعات از مصاحبۀ نیمه‏ساختاریافته استفاده شد. برای سنجش روایی و پایایی از مقبولیت، قابلیت انتقال، تاییدپذیری و بازآزمون استفاده شد. از تجزیه ‌و تحلیل داده ها 262 مفهوم اولیه استخراج شد که در 41 کد باز و 8 مضمون فرعی و 4 مضمون اصلی قرار گرفتند. مضامین اصلی شناسایی‌شده شامل راهبردهای مشارکتی و تعامل، راهبردهای حمایتی، راهبردهای فرهنگی و ترویجی و راهبردهای عملیاتی و هدایتی هستند. شناسایی و به‌کارگیری راهبردها و سیاست‌های مناسب به منظور بیشترین بهره‌مندی از ظرفیت‌های خیرین می‌تواند نقشی مهم را در تامین مالی و تسریع در اجرای پروژه‌های عمرانی ورزشی ایفا کند.

developing a model of strategic approaches for utilizing donors’ capacity in the enhancement of national sports infrastructure

introductionsport plays a significant role in health promotion, quality of life enhancement, and empowerment of individuals and society. public inclination towards sports necessitates the continuous development of sports facilities, equipment, and spaces, as the quantity and quality of such infrastructure directly influence the expansion of sporting activities within the community. one of the primary challenges in developing sports infrastructure is the reduction of governmental financial resources.in these circumstances, attracting support and financial contributions from donors for the construction and improvement of sports facilities appears essential. donors allocate a portion of their assets for philanthropic purposes, which may include land, buildings, equipment, and financial resources. in the realm of sports, donors can play a crucial role in developing sports infrastructure, such as stadiums, halls, and playing fields, by financing construction and renovation projects.however, to effectively harness donors’ capacity in this domain, it is necessary to adopt appropriate strategies, such as fostering coordination and collaboration between the government and donors, conducting precise needs assessments and project prioritization, encouraging donors to engage in underprivileged areas, and strengthening the culture of philanthropy in sports. therefore, the main objective of the present study is to identify efficient strategies for optimal utilization of donors’ capacity in developing the country’s sports infrastructure.research methodologythe present study is qualitative and exploratory and employs thematic analysis. the statistical sample comprised several active donors in the sports domain, senior sports managers with experience collaborating with sports donors, and university professors who are experts in this field. purposive and snowball sampling were utilized, and theoretical saturation was achieved after 23 interviews. initial interview questions were formulated based on the research background and intended objectives, with additional questions incorporated depending on interview conditions. each interview concluded by posing an open-ended question to interviewees, such as do you think there is anything that has not been asked about? interview durations ranged from 20 to 30 minutes. following the interviews, thematic analysis was applied to extract strategies for utilizing donors’ capacity in developing the country’s sports infrastructure.to validate the study’s findings, lincoln and guba’s (1985) evaluative criteria were employed as a framework for assessing qualitative research quality. these criteria include credibility, transferability, and dependability, which correspond to the conventional concepts in quantitative research known as internal validity, external validity, and reliability or trustworthiness, respectively.