شناسایی و تبیین ویژگی‌های مکان سوم در دانشگاه‌ها و نقش آن بر تعاملات اجتماعی (موردمطالعه: لابی دانشکده معماری و بوفه دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود)

پیشرفت شهرنشینی مدرن موجب کاهش تعاملات اجتماعی و افزایش انزوای افراد شده است. در این شرایط، «مکان‌های سوم» به عنوان فضاهای عمومی غیررسمی، نقش کلیدی در تقویت ارتباطات اجتماعی ایفا می‌کنند. دانشگاه‌ها به عنوان جوامعی کوچک‌مقیاس، نیازمند چنین فضاهایی برای تعاملات غیررسمی، استراحت و گفت‌وگوی دانشجویان هستند. این پژوهش با روش توصیفی-کیفی و از طریق مشاهده میدانی و مصاحبه‌های نیمه‌ساختاریافته، ویژگی‌های مکان‌های سوم (لابی دانشکده معماری و بوفه دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود) و تاثیر آن‌ها بر تعاملات اجتماعی را بررسی می‌کند. یافته‌ها نشان‌دهنده نقش حیاتی این فضاها در ایجاد پیوندهای اجتماعی است. مشاهدات به‌صورت حضوری و با در نظر گرفتن شرایط زمانی در مکان‌های موردمطالعه انجام شد که چک‌لیستی بر اساس معیارهای اولدنبرگ برای ارزیابی ویژگی‌های اجتماعی و فضایی تدوین گشت. همچنین، مصاحبه‌ها به روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس و با مشارکت 10 نفر از کاربران هر یک از مکان‌ها انجام شد. انتخاب مشارکت‌کنندگان بر اساس منطق مطالعات کیفی و اشباع نظری صورت گرفت که شامل 6 سوال اصلی برای درک بهتر ویژگی‌های مکان‌های سوم و تاثیر آن‌ها بر تعاملات اجتماعی بود. تحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از روش تحلیل محتوا بوده است. تبیین و تحلیل یافته‌های پیمایش میدانی بر اساس معیارهای مکان سوم اولدنبرگ نشان می‌دهد که لابی دانشکده فضایی دسترس‌پذیر برای تعاملات اجتماعی غیررسمی است و حس تعلق دانشجویان را تقویت می‌کند. بوفه دانشگاه نیز به‌عنوان مکانی خنثی و اجتماعی برای استراحت و گفت‌وگو شناخته می‌شود. مصاحبه‌ها تایید می‌کنند که این مکان‌ها نقش مهمی در ارتباطات دانشجویی دارند و دانشجویان از آن‌ها برای گپ‌زدن، استراحت و تعاملات غیررسمی استفاده می‌کنند.

identifying and analyzing the characteristics of third places in university settings and their impact on social interactions: a case study of the faculty of architecture lobby and cafeteria at shahrood university of technology

introductionmodern urban development and lifestyle changes have transformed social interactions, often contributing to isolation. yet, as inherently social beings, humans naturally seek spaces that encourage communication. third places—informal public areas like cafés, parks, and lobbies—serve as vital platforms for fostering connections, strengthening community bonds, and mitigating social detachment. these neutral, inclusive environments promote a sense of belonging through spontaneous interactions. universities, functioning as both academic and social hubs, particularly benefit from such spaces to facilitate meaningful relationships among students. this study examines the defining features of third places at shahroud university of technology's central campus, focusing on the faculty of architecture.theoretical frameworkthe concept of third places, introduced in the 1970s and popularized by ray oldenburg and dennis brissett, refers to public spaces that are neither home nor work, serving as venues for informal social interactions that enhance community bonds. key characteristics of third places include accessibility, simple and welcoming environments, and acceptance across social classes. in university settings, these spaces foster a sense of belonging, encourage informal exchanges among students, and build vibrant student communities. designing areas like cafés and recreational centers can significantly improve student satisfaction and retention while promoting social engagement. social interaction plays a vital role in the learning process, as it involves reciprocal actions that are understood by both individuals, and is a focus of study in psychology and sociology. spaces that support social interactions contribute to feelings of security, foster a sense of place, and reduce risky behaviors, thereby enriching the overall university experience. given the growing individualism and reliance on digital communication in modern society, creating suitable environments for social interaction in universities is essential for cultivating social cohesion and encouraging student relationships.methodologythis qualitative study was conducted on the central campus of shahrood university of technology, focusing on two informal social spaces: the lobby of the faculty of architecture and urban planning and the student cafeteria. these locations were chosen due to their significant role in fostering informal interactions among students. data collection involved field observations and semi-structured interviews. observations were conducted over six consecutive days (december 7–12, 2024), during various timeframes, to capture the spatial and social dynamics of these areas. a checklist based on oldenburg's criteria for third places guided the observations. purposeful and convenient sampling was used to select 20 participants—10 from each location—based on their familiarity with the space and their ability to articulate personal experiences. interviews were held both in person and online, each guided by six key questions. the data collection process continued until theoretical saturation was reached. data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis, with emerging themes categorized and interpreted. validity was ensured through detailed documentation, expert reviews, and prolonged engagement in the field. reliability was supported through data triangulation, thematic consistency, and member checking. the findings of this study are specific to the selected sites and cannot be generalized to all third places within the university campus.results and discussionwhile spaces like the lobby of the faculty of architecture and the university cafeteria do not completely embody all characteristics of third places, they exhibit several key features typical of such environments. these include providing a venue for casual interaction, minimizing formal power structures, and promoting a sense of social equality. these spaces are significant in students' daily lives as they facilitate social connections, foster a sense of belonging, and support psychological well-being. however, limitations such as restricted accessibility, simplistic design, and lack of aesthetic appeal prevent these areas from fully realizing their potential as third places. interviews indicate that specific campus spaces, including the architecture faculty lobby and the cafeteria, serve purposes beyond their basic physical or service functions and can be considered examples of third places. in the lobby, activities such as social interaction, resting, and conversation are prominent, contributing to a sense of belonging. students emphasize its social role and flexibility, suggesting that improvements in interior design, spatial layout, and the addition of services like a café could enhance the experience. at the same time, they acknowledge challenges such as overcrowding, limited facilities, and subpar design. regarding the cafeteria, while it serves an informal social purpose, it mainly caters to interactions among established social groups and is not very effective in fostering new connections. major obstacles to its role as a third place include crowding, inefficient design, and poor ventilation. nonetheless, aspects like a relatively comfortable atmosphere, good lighting, and a friendly environment enhance the sense of belonging and user satisfaction. in summary, the analysis suggests that to fully unlock the potential of these spaces as third places, design interventions, improvements in environmental performance, and enhancements in the overall spatial experience are essential.conclusionthis study examines the characteristics of third spaces at shahroud university and their role in enhancing social interactions among students. it is based on field observations and interviews conducted with students, focusing specifically on the lobby of the faculty of architecture and the university cafeteria. these areas are primarily used for informal social interactions and casual conversations. the lobby is described as a simple and accessible space that allows students to easily engage with one another, while the cafeteria serves as a venue for eating and resting, fostering a sense of belonging and promoting further informal interactions. to improve these spaces, suggestions include enhancing seating comfort, improving ventilation, and incorporating green areas. future research could utilize quantitative methods and longitudinal studies to further explore the impact of these environments on social interactions.