reinterpreting the foundations and anthropological reflections of humanistic thought in the structure of the universal declaration of human rights

The structure of the universal declaration of human rights (udhr) is based on humanistic thoughts, which has played an important role in its drafting motivations, content, and the actions of its implementers. it has specific foundations and reflections in the field of anthropology, which can be considered the anthropological bases of the declaration of human rights. in this view, man, separated from origin and resurrection (eschatology), replaces god and prioritizes his own desires over god’s. this descriptive-analytical article, by considering the content of the udhr, aims to extract the foundations of human rights, which are, in fact, the foundations and reflections of humanistic thought, such as: negating the belief in origin and resurrection, negating the non-material dimension, negating gender rights, expanding and encroaching rights into other domains, negating duty-orientation, prioritizing hedonism over duty-orientation, negating dignity from religious ethics and rights, and finally, individualism.

reinterpreting the foundations and anthropological reflections of humanistic thought in the structure of the universal declaration of human rights

the structure of the universal declaration of human rights (udhr) is based on humanistic thoughts, which has played an important role in its drafting motivations, content, and the actions of its implementers. it has specific foundations and reflections in the field of anthropology, which can be considered the anthropological bases of the declaration of human rights. in this view, man, separated from origin and resurrection (eschatology), replaces god and prioritizes his own desires over god’s. this descriptive-analytical article, by considering the content of the udhr, aims to extract the foundations of human rights, which are, in fact, the foundations and reflections of humanistic thought, such as: negating the belief in origin and resurrection, negating the non-material dimension, negating gender rights, expanding and encroaching rights into other domains, negating duty-orientation, prioritizing hedonism over duty-orientation, negating dignity from religious ethics and rights, and finally, individualism.