تحلیل شرط ضمان در عقد رهن با تاکید برقاعده فقهی (کل رهن فانه غیر مضمون)

شرط ضمان در عقد رهن ، از مهمترین مباحث فقهی است که با توجه به قاعده فقهی (کل رهن فانه غیر مضمون)آراء و دیدگاههای مختلفی از سوی فقها بیان شده است . برخی از فقها قائل به بطلان این شرط هستند و برخی معتقدند این شرط خلاف مقتضای ذات عقد است و برخی هم چنین شرطی را صحیح می دانند. با توجه به اینکه پژوهش به صورت مروری و نظری است مقاله حاضر با بهره گیری از روش توصیفی تحلیلی و مبتنی بر روش کتابخانه ای و با استفاده از تحقیقات ، کتب ، اسناد و منابع کتابخانه ای مرتبط در صدد بررسی صحت و بطلان این نوع شرط با توجه به قاعده فقهی(کل رهن فانه غیر مضمون )می باشد. و درصدد اثبات این فرضیه هستیم که: که ادلۀ مخالفان برای اثبات بطلان این شرط ضمان در عقد رهن ناکافی است و این اشتراط با توجه به عمومات و اطلاقات ادله وجوب التزام به شروط، صحیح و التزام به آن واجب است

analysis of the guarantee condition in the mortgage contract with an emphasis on the jurisprudential rule (all non-guaranteed non-guaranteed mortgages)

the guarantee condition in the mortgage contract is one of the most important jurisprudential issues, which according to the jurisprudential rule (all mortgages are non-guaranteed) different opinions and views have been expressed by jurists. some jurists believe that this condition is invalid, and some believe that this condition is against the essence of the contract, and some consider such a condition to be valid. due to the fact that the research is a review and theory, the present article by using the analytical descriptive method based on the library method and by using related researches, books, documents and library resources aims to check the validity and invalidity of this type of condition with paying attention to the rule of jurisprudence (all mortgaging mortgages are unsecured). and we are trying to prove this hypothesis: that the arguments of the opponents are insufficient to prove the invalidity of this guarantee condition in the mortgage contract, and this requirement is correct and obligatory according to the generality and application of the evidence and the obligation to adhere to the conditions. the guarantee condition in the mortgage contract is one of the most important jurisprudential issues, which according to the jurisprudential rule (all mortgages are non-guaranteed) different opinions and views have been expressed by jurists. some jurists believe that this condition is invalid, and some believe that this condition is against the essence of the contract, and some consider such a condition to be valid. due to the fact that the research is a review and theory, the present article by using the analytical descriptive method based on the library method and by using related researches, books, documents and library resources aims to check the validity and invalidity of this type of condition with paying attention to the rule of jurisprudence (all mortgaging mortgages are unsecured). and we are trying to prove this hypothesis: that the arguments of the opponents are insufficient to prove the invalidity of this guarantee condition in the mortgage contract, and this requirement is correct and obligatory according to the generality and application of the evidence and the obligation to adhere to the conditions. ...(edited)restore original