floor crossing in the constitution of the people’s republic of bangladesh: a comparative legal perspective

Whether floor crossing is democratic or undemocratic under article 70 of the bangladeshi constitution is a significant question. the major goal of this rule is to prevent members of parliament (mps) from voting against their party, lest their seats in parliament be vacated. however, this article’s violation of the members of parliament’s (mps’) right to free speech is a major matter for worry, as it violates their fundamental rights. the primary purpose of this study is to examine the existing floor crossing law to determine whether or not it constitutes a breach of fundamental rights as embodied in the bangladeshi constitution, and to identify the gaps prevalent in the provision regulating floor crossing. this paper employs the doctrinal research methodology, utilizing journal articles, textbooks, academic databases, and online resources. in this study, we’ve attempted to introduce the provisions of floor crossing and describe it with historical context, article 70 of the constitution of the people’s republic of bangladesh, and provisions in other nations such as the united states, the united kingdom, and india. we have reviewed the rationale for barring floor crossing and why this provision will not be altered. we have also reviewed a recent incidence involving floor crossing and a case study that constructively critiques the regulation. we have determined that floor crossing is abandoning one’s party in parliament to vote for the opposing party during the bill’s voting or passage, and we have provided recommendations to fix this issue and make the provision of floor crossing acceptable for the benefit of our people.