تحلیل نگرش کنشگران کلیدی از عوامل موثر بر ناپایداری توسعه مسکن روستایی (مورد مطالعه: روستاهای حاشیه زاینده‌ رود فلاورجان)

بهبود وضعیت مسکن روستایی و کاهش عوامل ناپایداری مسکن می‌تواند به بهبود کیفیت زندگی و توسعه پایدار کمک کند. پژوهش حاضر از لحاظ هدف، کاربردی و از نظر شیوه انجام از نوع ترکیبی (کمی و کیفی) است. در این پژوهش عوامل تاثیرگذار در ناپایداری مسکن روستاهای حاشیه زاینده‌رود شهرستان فلاورجان مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. مشارکت‌کننده‌گان در پژوهش، خبرگان و کنشگران صاحب‌نظر در 21 روستا حاشیه رودخانه زاینده‌رود، سطح شهرستان فلاورجان و استان اصفهان هستند که به روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب شدند. اشباع نظری با تعداد 30 نفر محقق شد. برای جمع‌آوری اطلاعات، از فن مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختارمند استفاده شد. در نهایت از بین عوامل (کشف شده)، پس از پالایش و دسته‌بندی 37 عامل کلیدی ناپایداری مسکن انتخاب گردید و گویه‌های استخراج شده با بهره‌گیری از روش کیو اولویت‌بندی و داده‌های جمع‌آوری شده در نرم افزار  kadeبا روش تحلیل مولفه‌های اصلی pca و چرخش واریماکس مورد تحلیل قرار گرفتند. بر اساس یافته‌های تحقیق، این نتیجه حاصل شد که چهار نوع دیدگاه متفاوت در ارتباط با عوامل ناپایداری مسکن روستایی وجود دارد. گروه دانشگاهیان (با اکثریت اعضای هیات علمی) بر عوامل حاکمیت بوروکراسی در دریافت تسهیلات و خدمات و ضعف بسترسازی برای دسترسی به بیمه تضمین کیفیت در صنعت ساختمان، گروه کارشناسان اجرایی (با اکثریت تحصیل کردگان) بر عامل افزایش هزینه ساخت مسکن، گروه دیپلمه‌های جامعه محلی و پژوهشگران بر عامل افزایش بی‌رویه هزینه ساخت مسکن و در نهایت گروه تحصیل کردگان جامعه محلی بر طولانی بودن زمان ارائه خدمات توسط دستگاه‌های متولی و افزایش هزینه‌های ساخت مسکن تاکید داشتند.

analyzing the attitude of key actors on the factors affecting the instability of rural housing development (case: villages in zayanderood river basin villages)

introduction:housing is not just a physical structure; it is a fundamental aspect of human well-being and social stability. in rural areas, housing conditions are closely linked to various socio-economic factors, including income levels, employment opportunities, access to services, and community cohesion. housing is a cornerstone of sustainable development and a critical determinant of quality of life. in iran, rural housing has been a focal point of rural development initiatives for several decades, particularly since the establishment of a centralized rural development system. these initiatives have been implemented through various rural executive plans. despite these efforts, rural housing in iran is undergoing significant changes and irregularities. in the other words, rural housing has been a critical component of national development policies, reflecting the government’s commitment to improving living standards in rural areas. however, the effectiveness of these policies has been mixed, with many rural communities still facing significant challenges related to housing stability and quality. understanding the factors contributing to housing instability is essential for developing a logical understanding and analysis of sustainable rural housing dynamics. this knowledge is invaluable for housing managers and planners to predict future trends and manage housing efficiently. previous studies have not sufficiently explored the attitudes of local actors regarding the challenges of rural housing. this study aims to identify and analyze the underlying factors of housing instability in rural areas from the perspective of local experts and rural elites in the villages along the zayandeh river in flowerjan county. methodology:this research employs a mixed-methods approach, integrating both quantitative and qualitative techniques. the study’s participants include local experts and rural elites from 20 villages in the zayandeh river basin, within flowerjan county in isfahan province. participants were selected using a purposeful sampling method, achieving theoretical saturation with 30 individuals. data collection was conducted through semi-structured interviews, allowing for an in-depth exploration of the factors influencing housing instability. this approach ensured a comprehensive understanding of the various perspectives and experiences of the participants.the mixed-methods approach is particularly well-suited for this study because it allows for the triangulation of data, enhancing the validity and reliability of the findings. by combining quantitative and qualitative data, the research can capture the complexity of housing instability and provide a more nuanced understanding of the underlying factors. the semi-structured interviews were designed to elicit detailed responses from participants, enabling the researchers to explore the nuances of their experiences and perspectives.the collected data were meticulously refined and categorized, resulting in the identification of 37 key factors contributing to housing instability. these factors were prioritized using the q method, a technique that allows for the systematic study of subjectivity. the data were then analyzed using principal component analysis (pca) and varimax rotation within the q methodology software. this analytical process helped to distill the complex data into clear, actionable insights. the q method is particularly useful for this type of research because it allows for the identification of distinct viewpoints among participants. by prioritizing the factors contributing to housing instability, the researchers were able to identify common themes and patterns in the data.