Explaining the Conceptual Framework of Good City-Based Governance on Integrated Urban Management

Developing countries generally refer to governance on people in the name of an “urban good governance” as a proper process of urban management. in fact, from the point of persuasion of the international institutions of policy, economics and politics, good governance has been promoted as the key to the concept of evolution. the present necessity is based on the lack of integrity in the urban management structure of tehran, which is also subject to organizational and functional disruption based on the theoretical structure. therefore, the conceptual framework definition on the macro scale of the structure is considered not only as the main necessity of the governance system in the sphere of governance. but democratic and bottom-up analysis in planning, designing a model of good urban sense of judgment can address the main problems of urban management not only in tehran, but also in other cities of iran. the main purpose of the research is to explain the conceptual framework of urban integrated management based on urban good governance and also to determine the meaningful relationships of functional, structural and organizational factors of integrated management according to the principles of governance and the evaluation of effective indicators of integrated urban management. the present research is descriptive-analytical method. in terms of the purpose, the hypothesized frameworks are classified through a comparative structure that is extracted from the components, sub-components and main indicators, and then all of these indices are derived from the homogeneity filter, overlap and packs are passed, which is reduced to a single form of 74 sub-components and 13 indicators. to evaluate and analyze the following subcriteria and criteria indices, we use the weight distribution method, taking into account the delphi method, which was first calculated by taking into account the weight of the weight and examining the differences between each of them, and the indicators with the main priority such as participation, service, transparency and effectiveness are considered as indicators of the type of observation and examination of specialized groups in the institutions and related organizations