|
|
نخستین نگارگر، نخستین امضاء (رقم) بررسی امضاء (رقم) در نگارههای ایرانی، پیش از ظهور جنید سلطانی
|
|
|
|
|
نویسنده
|
رئیسی ایمان ,شعیری حمید رضا ,حسنوند محمدکاظم
|
منبع
|
رهپويه هنر/هنرهاي تجسمي - 1401 - دوره : 5 - شماره : 2 - صفحه:109 -120
|
چکیده
|
یکی از موضوعات چالشبرانگیز در نگارگری ایرانی آن است که کدام نگارگر برای نخستین بار، و در چه زمانی، اثرش را امضاء زده است. پژوهشگران بسیاری معتقدند که جنید بغدادی، نخستین نگارگریست که با لقب سلطانی،-لقبی که سلطاناحمد جلایر به او اعطا کرده بود-؛ اثرش را در خمسه خواجوی کرمانی (798 ه.ق) امضاء نمود. این ادعا از زمان نگارش نخستین تاریخنگاریها دربارهی نقاشی ایرانی، از شروع قرن بیستم تاکنون، در متون مختلف تکرار شده است. در این مقاله، با رویکردی انتقادی، ضمن نقد منابع، نگارههای دارای امضاء به ترتیب زمانی، معرفی و بررسی خواهند شد. بررسی هشت نگارهی این مقاله نشان میدهد، در دوره جلایری- پیش از دورهی سلطاناحمد جلایر (784-813 ه.ق)- و دورهی سلجوقی نگارههای متعددی با امضاء نگارگران مصور شده است. این نگارهها در فاصلهی زمانی نیمه دوم قرن هفتم تا سال 798 ه.ق تولید شدهاند. طبق نتیجه پژوهش، قدیمیترین نگارهی دارای امضاء به عبدالمومن بن محمدالنقاش الخویی تعلّق دارد که در کتاب ورقه و گلشاه، با خط نسخ و به رنگ سفید امضاء شده است. جهت رسیدن به هدف مقاله از منابع کتابخانهای استفاده شده است. نگارهها نیز از سایت کتابخانههای بریتانیا، برلین، و استانبول دریافت گردیدهاند. روش پژوهش نیز به صورت تاریخی، توصیفی-تحلیلی و انتقادی میباشد.
|
کلیدواژه
|
نگارگری ایران، مکتب بغداد جلایری، مکتب سلجوقی، جنید سلطانی، عبدالمومن بن محمدالنقاش الخویی، امضاء (رقم)
|
آدرس
|
دانشگاه تربیت مدرس, دانشکده هنر و معماری, گروه هنر اسلامی, ایران, دانشگاه تربیت مدرس, دانشکده علوم انسانی, گروه زبان و ادبیات فرانسه, ایران, دانشگاه تربیت مدرس, دانشکده هنر و معماری, گروه نقاشی, ایران
|
پست الکترونیکی
|
mkh@modares.ac.ir
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
first painter, the first signature (raqam); a study of signatures (raqam) in persian painting, before the advent of junaid sultani*
|
|
|
Authors
|
raeisi iman ,shairi hamid reza ,hasanvand mohammadkazem
|
Abstract
|
the the first attempts to identify iranian art were made in arthur upham pope’s comprehensive work entitled a survey of persian art. special attention to iranian art and especially iranian painting led to the formation of a kind of iranian painting historiography in which special attention was paid to the classification of historical periods and the naming of painting schools. it has been created in those periods. by identifying and separating schools; the works, artists, and painters of the creator of the work were categorized, and then the individual style characteristics of each of the painters, theologians, and scribes were examined, as well as the manuscripts according to their beginnings, conclusions, and dates. the contents of them or the names of the scribes and commissioners, as well as the manner of execution of the headings and inscriptions and the lines written in them are attributed to these courses. in iranian painting, a large part of the identity of a painting owes to the artist who created it as a painter. one of the most important factors in recognizing the creator of a work is the existence of the signature (raqam) that the artist leaves on the work. also, one of the most important topics in iranian painting is attributing the name of the first painter painting, which has been honored to sign the painting and its work. ernst kuhnel was one of the first researchers to signature (raqam) the work in iranian painting. in his notes, he first refers to the version of “humay and humayun” by khajo-ye kermani, which was illustrated during the reign of sultan ahmad jalayer, and then introduces junaid baghdadi as the first painter painter who was able to soltani to raqam his work entitled “wedding day of prince humay and humayun” in 799 ah. this title was awarded to junaid during his activity in baghdad by sultan ahmad jalayer. kuhnel’s statement has been confirmed and republished by many scholars. however, it should be noted that kuhnel made a mistake in attributing the date of this version to 799 ah, and this mistake caused other writers and researchers who have studied the version of humay and homayoun khajo-ye kermani, this mistake of his repeated in books and articles, and this illustrated work is mentioned on the same date, in the year 799 ah. attribute. they do not appear to have seen the expiration date of the illustrations for khajo-ye kermani, now housed in the british library, or to have mistranslated the arabic text. therefore, in this article, an attempt has been made to question these views first, and then to claim that there were undoubtedly other paintings that belong to the period before junaid baghdadi and by painters who lived before junaid. have been active, signed. therefore, in order to achieve the accuracy of this issue and to respond to this skepticism and claim, examples of works by iranian painters who worked in the library - royal workshops of other kings before junaid have been examined, until the truth or falsity of this claim should be clarified. therefore, the purpose of this article is to study paintings that have several features; first, that the paintings have a signature or raqam, and second, before junaid’s time of activity; that is, they were produced before the creation of the painting “wedding day of prince humay with humayon”, in 798 ah. therefore, in this article, eight signed paintings or figures, which have been obtained and collected from libraries and museums of the world, have been examined. an examination of the eight paintings in this article shows that in the jalayerid period - the period before the reign of sultan ahmad jalayer - as well as the seljuk period, paintings were created with the raqams and signatures of painters such as ahmad musa, mir dolatyar, mir khalil, sultan uways jalayer and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|