ارتباط مولفه‌های سرمایه اجتماعی با کیفیت زندگی در زنان سرپرست خانوار شهر دوگنبدان

هدف از این پژوهش تعیین رابطه مولفه های سرمایه اجتماعی با کیفیت زندگی در زنان سرپرست خانوار شهر دوگنبدان می باشد. این مطالعه مقطعی بر روی زنان سرپرست خانوار شهردوگنبدان (200 نفر) در مدت 6 ماه انجام شد. ابزار مطالعه شامل: پرسشنامه های اطلاعات دموگرافیک، کیفیت زندگی سازمان جهانی بهداشت (whoqol) گونه ایرانی و پرسشنامه سرمایه اجتماعی بانک جهانی (sc - iq) بود. آنالیز نتایج به کمک نرم افزار آماری spss با استفاده از آزمون های آمار توصیفی و تحلیلی انجام شد. یافته های این مطالعه نشان داد کیفیت زندگی و سرمایه اجتماعی زنان سرپرست خانوار کاملا به هم وابسته بوده و روی همدیگر اثر مثبت دارند و کیفیت زندگی زنان سرپرست خانوار شهر دوگنبدان در سطح پایین تری از کیفیت زندگی عموم مردم این شهر قرار دارد و از طرفی دیگر سرمایه اجتماعی در این زنان نسبتا پایین است و نیاز به توجه جدی و برنامه ریزی درازمدت مسئولین امر بر اساس رویکردهای پژوهشی مبتنی بر جامعه، در راستای بهبود کیفیت زندگی و تغییرات اساسی در جهت افزایش سرمایه اجتماعی و مشارکت جمعی این قشر آسیب پذیر است.

The relationship between social capital and quality of life in female-headed households in Dogonbadan City

The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between social capital and quality of life in femaleheaded households in Dogonbadan This cross sectional study was done on women headsof Dogonbadan City during six months. (200 Person) Study tools were include: demographic questionnaire, the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) Iranian species. and questionnaire of World Bank social capital (SCIQ), respectively. Analysis of results were performed with SPSS software and using Descriptive statisticsand analytical Tests The findings of this study demonstrate that the quality of life and social capital for womenheaded households are totally interdependent and they have positive impact on each other. and life quality of femaleheaded households Dogonbadan was at a lower level of Dogonbadan People’s general quality of life. and on the other hand, social capital is relatively low in these women and requires serious attention and longterm planning authorities based on communitybased research approaches, in order to improve the quality of life and significant changes in order to increase social capital and This collective participation of vulnerable people.Extended AbstractIntroduction:      The concept of quality of life dates back to the time of Aristotle in 385 BC. At that time, Aristotle considered &good life& or &doing good things& to mean happiness. At that time, living happily is considered equivalent to what is called quality of life today. Quality of life reform was not used until the twentieth century. Over time, researchers have realized that quality of life can be one of the most important consequences of health assessments. As the World Health Organization’s definition of health emphasizes (Fayers and Machin, 2013.55). Quality of life is a complex and multidimensional concept of population conditions and status, defined in a specific geographical scale (city, village and country) (Harirchi, 2009.98). From the beginning of the 60’s, the concept of quality of life became popular in European countries. In some advanced societies, the term has been used in conjunction with and sometimes synonymously with other terms such as public welfare, social welfare, social security, and the like. The category of quality of life is widely related to the concept of welfare, social relations, trust and social participation (Noghani, 2008.112) and can be the basis for strengthening social capital. Social capital is one of the social determinants of health that affects the health of communities (Murayama et al, 2012). Numerous indicators can be used to measure social capital in a society at the macro level. One of these indicators is the level of social support for vulnerable groups in society (children, women, etc.) (Siegler, 2014).