Epistemic and Metaphysical Possibility Or Impossibility of God’S Existence According To Wittgenstein

Skepticism and the possibility of obtaining the certainty of the existence or non-existence of god can be examined in two different approaches to philosophy; the first approach poses the problem epistemologically in a general and abstract framework cut from the tangible conditions and then seeks a way to apply what it has proven in the realm of mind to the outside world, or to claim it has been in accordance with the reality already.in this approach, which has a long history, thinkers have tried to finally bring all knowledge to fail-safe and fundamental propositions and show that not only the rest of our propositions and the whole cognitive system are a combination of them, but this cognitive system corresponds to the system of existence in reality. in most of these classical rationalizations, too, god sits at the head of the system.after hume's attacks on these epistemological systems and the arguments of the existence of god, kant, with his copernican philosophical revolution, responded appropriately to hume, explaining why we humans need the assumption of the mysterious absolute at the top of our rational system in order to systematize and illustrate the universe. therefore, we should not equate the absolute that the various philosophers assumed at the head of their human intellect system with god, from the beginning but it happened. we will examine the first approach, in accordance with the two important topics of private language and the criterion of meaning in wittgenstein's philosophy, to analyze how under the pressure of classical philosophy, meaning and use come apart. moreover, why when we claim an external existence for the god sitting at the head of the epistemological rational system, we are confronted with contradictory conditions and delusion of meaning. accordingly, in general, meaningful criteria in language do not have the power to convince or assure the existence of anything, and we cannot rely on them to arrive at a convincing rationality. as a result of the findings obtained from the analysis of the first approach, we have arrive at the second approach, according to which philosophizing is considered a kind of intellectual activity or philosophical research on a particular form of life. the form of life is a factor in the production of meanings and language games for the human beings within it, and imposes the normative and structured of the normal nature of its existence over the whole of his content of life and manner of experience, to finally give direction to the way he thinks and his attitude towards existence and its origin. skepticism, therefore, the possibility of obtaining certainty and arguing for the existence or non-existence of god, is also examined within a unified narrative of this particular form of life. so that as a result of such an approach, with reliance on the nature of religious belief in wittgenstein's philosophy, we can analyze the possibility or impossibility of obtaining certainty and arguing for the existence or non-existence of god.