تبیین جامعه شناختی خشونت علیه همسر از دریچه تئوری عمومی جرم (قلمروهای زندگی) اگنیو

ﻫﺪف اﺻﻠﯽ ا ﯾﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﭼﺮ اﯾﯽ ﻣﺒﺎدرت اﻓﺮاد ﺑﻪ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ﻋ ﻠﯿﻪ ﻫﻤﺴﺮ ﺑﺎ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از ﺗﺌﻮری ﻋﻤﻮﻣﯽ ﺟﺮم )ﻗﻠﻤﺮوﻫﺎی زﻧﺪﮔﯽ( اﮔﻨﯿ ﻮ اﺳﺖ. روش ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﺗﻮﺻ ﯿﻔ ﯽ ﻫﻤﺒﺴﺘﮕﯽ ﺑﻮد. ﺑﺎ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ 450 ﻧﻔﺮی از زﻧﺎن و ﻣﺮدان ﻣﺘﺄﻫﻞ ﻣﺮاﺟﻌﻪ ﮐﻨﻨﺪه ﺑﻪ دادﮔﺎهﻫﺎی ﺧﺎﻧﻮاده، ﻣﺮاﮐﺰ ﺑﻬﺰﯾﺴﺘﯽ و ﮐﻤﯿﺘﻪ اﻣﺪاد اﻣﺎم ﺧﻤﯿﻨﯽ ﺷﻬﺮ رﺷﺖ ﺑﻪ روش ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﮔﯿﺮی در دﺳﺘﺮس اﻧﻨﺨﺎب و ﻣﻔﺮوﺿﻪ ﻫﺎی ﺗﺌﻮری ﻋﻤﻮﻣﯽ ﺟﺮم ﻣﻮرد ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﻗﺮار ﮔﺮﻓﺖ. ﻣﻘﯿﺎسﻫﺎی ﻣﻮرد اﺳﺘﻔﺎده در ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ﻋ ﻠﯿﻪ ﻫﻤﺴﺮ، ﻣﺤﺪودﯾﺖ در ﺑﺮاﺑﺮ ﺟﺮم، اﻧﮕﯿﺰه ﺑﺮ ای ﺟﺮم، ﻗﻠﻤﺮو ﻣﺸﮑﻞ آﻓﺮﯾﻦ ﻓﺮدی، ﺧﺎﻧﻮادﮔ ﯽ، -0 /148 -(، ﺳﻄﺢ ﺗﺤﺼﯿﻼت )ﺿﺮﯾﺐ ﺑﺘﺎ: 0 /095از آن اﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ ﺳﻦ )ﺿﺮﯾﺐ ﺑﺘﺎ: ﻫﻤﺎﻻن و ﺷﻐﻠﯽ ﺑﻮد. ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ ﺣﺎﮐ ﯽ ﺟﻨﺴﯿ ﺖ )ﺿﺮﯾﺐ ﺑﺘﺎ: 0/105(، ﻗﻠﻤﺮو ﻫﻤﺎﻻن ﻣﺸﮑﻞ آﻓﺮﯾﻦ )ﺿﺮﯾﺐ ﺑﺘﺎ: 0/094(، ﻗﻠﻤﺮو ﻓﺮد ی ﻣﺸﮑﻞ آﻓﺮﯾﻦ )ﺿﺮﯾﺐ ﺑﺘﺎ: 0.133(، ﻗﻠﻤﺮو ﺧﺎﻧﻮادﮔ ﯽ ﻣﺸﮑﻞ آﻓﺮﯾﻦ )ﺿﺮﯾﺐ ﺑﺘﺎ: 0/215(، ﻗﻠﻤﺮو ﺷﻐﻠ ﯽ ﻣﺸﮑﻞ آﻓ ﺮﯾﻦ )ﺿﺮﯾﺐ ﺑﺘﺎ: 0/170(، ﻣﺤﺪودﯾﺖ در ﺑﺮاﺑﺮ ﺟﺮم )ﺿﺮﯾﺐ ﺑﺘﺎ: 0/273( و اﻧﮕﯿﺰه ﺑﺮ ای ﺟﺮم )ﺿﺮﯾﺐ ﺑﺘﺎ: 0.211(، ﺗﺄﺛ ﯿﺮ ﻣﻌﻨﺎدار و ﻣﺴﺘﻘﯿﻤﯽ ﺑﺮ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ﻋﻠﯿﻪ ﻫﻤﺴﺮ دارﻧﺪ. در ﺑﻌﺪی دﯾﮕﺮ ، ﻗﻠﻤﺮو ﻫﻤﺎﻻن ﻣﺸﮑﻞآﻓﺮﯾﻦ )ﺿﺮﯾﺐ ﺑﺘﺎ: 0.197(، ﻗﻠﻤﺮو ﻓﺮدی ﻣﺸﮑﻞ آﻓﺮﯾﻦ )ﺿﺮﯾﺐ ﺑﺘﺎ: 0/157(، ﻗﻠﻤﺮو ﺧﺎﻧﻮادﮔﯽ ﻣﺸﮑﻞ آﻓﺮﯾﻦ )ﺿﺮﯾﺐ ﺑﺘﺎ: 0/217( و ﻗﻠﻤﺮو ﺷﻐﻠ ﯽ ﻣﺸﮑﻞ آﻓﺮﯾﻦ )ﺿﺮﯾﺐ ﺑﺘﺎ: 0/170( ﺗﺄﺛﯿ ﺮ ﻣﻌﻨﺎداری ﺑﺮ اﻧﮕ ﯿﺰه ﺑﺮ ای ﺟﺮم دارﻧﺪ. ﻫﻤﭽﻨ ﯿﻦ ، ﻗﻠﻤﺮو ﻫﻤﺎﻻن ﻣﺸﮑﻞ آﻓﺮ ﯾﻦ )ﺿﺮﯾﺐ ﺑﺘﺎ: 0/111(، ﻗﻠﻤﺮو ﻓﺮدی ﻣﺸﮑﻞ آﻓﺮﯾﻦ )ﺿﺮﯾﺐ ﺑﺘﺎ: 0/189(، ﻗﻠﻤﺮو ﺧﺎﻧﻮادﮔﯽ ﻣﺸﮑﻞ آﻓﺮﯾﻦ )ﺿﺮﯾﺐ ﺑﺘﺎ: 0/204( و ﻗﻠﻤﺮو ﺷﻐﻠﯽ ﻣﺸﮑﻞ آﻓﺮﯾﻦ)ﺿﺮﯾﺐ ﺑﺘﺎ: 0/175( ﺗﺄﺛﯿﺮ ﻣﻌﻨﺎداری ﺑﺮ ﻣﺤﺪودﯾﺖ در ﺑﺮاﺑﺮ ﺟﺮم دارﻧﺪ. ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺿﺮ اﯾﺐ ﻏﯿﺮﻣﺴﺘﻘﯿﻢ ﻣﺪل ﻧﺸﺎن ﻣﯽ دﻫﺪ ﮐﻪ ﻗﻠﻤﺮو ﻫﻤﺎﻻن ﻣﺸﮑﻞ آﻓﺮﯾﻦ )ﺿﺮﯾﺐ ﺑﺘﺎ: 0/073(، ﻗﻠﻤﺮو ﻓﺮدی ﻣﺸﮑﻞ آﻓﺮ ﯾﻦ )ﺿﺮﯾﺐ ﺑﺘﺎ: 0/085(، ﻗﻠﻤﺮو ﺧﺎﻧﻮادﮔﯽ ﻣﺸﮑﻞ آﻓﺮﯾﻦ )ﺿﺮﯾﺐ ﺑﺘﺎ: 0/101( و ﻗﻠﻤﺮو ﺷﻐﻠﯽ ﻣﺸﮑﻞ آﻓﺮﯾﻦ )ﺿﺮ ﯾﺐ ﺑﺘﺎ: 0/083( ﺑﺎ ﺗﺄﺛﯿﺮﮔﺬاری ﺑﺮ ﻣﺤﺪودﯾﺖ در ﺑﺮاﺑﺮ ﺟﺮم و اﻧﮕﯿﺰه ﺑﺮ ای ﺟﺮم )ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮرت ﻏ ﯿﺮﻣﺴﺘﻘﯿﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ﻋﻠﯿ ﻪ ﻫﻤﺴﺮ ﺗﺄﺛﯿﺮ دارﻧﺪ. ﭼﻬﺎر ﻗﻠﻤﺮو ﻣﺸﮑﻞ آﻓﺮﯾﻦ زﻧﺪﮔﯽ، اﻧﮕﯿﺰه ﺑﺮ ای ﺟﺮم و ﻣﺤﺪودﯾﺖ در ﺑﺮاﺑﺮ ﺟﺮم و ﻫﻤﭽﻨﯿﻦ ﻣﺘﻐﯿﺮﻫﺎی دﻣﻮﮔﺮاﻓﯿ ﮏ ﻗﺎدرﻧﺪ 58درﺻﺪ از وارﯾﺎﻧﺲ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ﻋﻠﯿ ﻪ ﻫﻤﺴﺮ را ﺗﺒ ﯿﯿﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﯾﻨﺪ. ﻫﻤﭽﻨﯿﻦ ﻗﻠﻤﺮوﻫﺎی ﻣﺸﮑﻞ آﻓﺮﯾﻦ زﻧﺪﮔﯽ ﯾﻌﻨﯽ ﻗﻠﻤﺮوﻫﺎی ﺧﺎﻧﻮاد، ﻓﺮدی، ﻫﻤﺎﻻن و ﺷﻐﻠ ﯽ ﻗﺎدرﻧﺪ 21درﺻﺪ از وارﯾﺎﻧﺲ ﻣﺤﺪودﯾﺖ در ﺑﺮاﺑﺮ ﺟﺮم و 25درﺻﺪ از وارﯾﺎﻧﺲ اﻧﮕﯿ ﺰه ﺑﺮ ای ﺟﺮم را ﺗﺒﯿﯿﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﯾﻨﺪ.

sociological explanation of intimate partner violence through the lens of agnew’s general theory of crime (life domains).

the main purpose of this article is to investigate why people resort to violence against their spouses using agnew's general theory of crime (domains of life). the research method employed was descriptive-correlational. a sample of 450 married men and women, drawn from individuals referring to family courts, welfare centers, and the imam khomeini relief committee in rasht city, was investigated using the available sampling method and assumptions based on the general theory of crime. the scales used in the research included violence against spouse, constrains against crime, motivation for crime, personal, family, family, and occupational problem-causing domains. the results indicate that age (beta coefficient: -0.095), education level (beta coefficient: -0.148), gender (beta coefficient: 0.105), problematic family domain (beta coefficient: 0.094), problematic personal domain (beta coefficient: 0.133), problematic family domain (beta coefficient: 0.215), problematic occupational domain (beta coefficient: 0.170), constrains against crime (beta coefficient: 0.273) and motivation for crime (beta coefficient: 0.211), have a significant and direct effect on violence against spouse. in the other dimension, problematic peer domain (beta coefficient: 0.197), the problematic personal domain (beta coefficient: 0.157), the problematic family domain (beta coefficient: 0.217) and the problematic occupational domain (beta coefficient: 0.170) have a significant effect on the motivation for crime. also, the problematic peer domain (beta coefficient: 0.111), problematic personal domain (beta coefficient: 0.189), problematic family domain (beta coefficient: 0.204) and problematic occupational domain (beta coefficient: 0.175) have a significant effect on the constrains against crime. the summary of the indirect coefficients of the model shows that the problematic peer domain (beta coefficient: 0.073), the problematic personal domain (beta coefficient: 0.085), the problematic family domain (beta coefficient: 0.101) and the problematic occupational domain (beta coefficient: 0.083) by affecting the constrains against crime and motivation for crime indirectly affect violence against spouse. the four problematic life domains, motivation for crime and constrains against crime, as well as demographic variables are able to 58 explain the percentage of the variance of violence against the spouse. also, the problematic domains of life are able to explain 21% of the variance of the constrains against crime and 25% of the variance of the motivation for crime.