comparison the effect of high and low contextual interference training on performance accuracy

Objective: the aim of this study was to determine the differences between differentmethods of contextual interference (high and low) on accuracy.methods: the subjects were 51 people from shiraz mental health park rehabilitationcenter who were purposefully selected and after the pre-test, they were randomly dividedinto three groups. the high and low interference groups performed 180 frisbee attempts(backhand, forehand, and hammer) and the control group played a team game at the sametime as the intervention groups. then, acquisition, retention and immediate transfer testswere taken. accuracy was measured using a researcher-made test.results: the results of repeated measures test showed no significant difference in the phaseof acquisition and there was a significant difference between the groups in the phases oftransfer (p = 0.011) and retention (p = 0.026).conclusion: it seems that the results of this study can be effective in reducing researchers'concerns in simultaneous training of several motor skills by emphasizing the movementpattern and achieving the goal of movement (accuracy). findings indicate that the use ofcontextual interference methods, at high levels, leads to time savings and stabilizes thepattern of movement in the learning phases.