تاثیر ادراک نظام شناختی دولت های یازدهم و دوازدهم از مذاکرات هسته ای ایران با غرب

بررسی نظام شناختی سیاست‌مداران و سیاست‌گذاران یکی از مهم‌ترین قالب‌های شناخت و بررسی رفتارها، کنش‌ها و تصمیم‌گیری‌های این افراد است. نظام شناختی افراد به‌معنای ادراک، نوع جهان‌بینی، باورها و ارزش‌ها و همچنین گفتمان‌های حاکم بر این باورها نقش و تاثیرات بسیار عمیقی در این فرایند دارند. الگوی‌های تصمیم‌گیری هسته‌ای جمهوری اسلامی ایران به‌عنوان بزرگ‌ترین مسئله سیاست خارجی در دوران پساانقلاب، به‌صورت غیرقابل‌انکاری تحت تاثیر روان‌شناسی شناخت، کیش شخصیتی، ساخت‌های ادراکی و سبک رهبری سیاست‌مداران حاکم در این عرصه بوده است. در پژوهش حاضر، ما به دنبال بررسی و فهم نظام شناختی دولت تدبیر و امید و تاثیرات آن در رویکردهای سیاسی و تصمیمات اتخاذشده ایران درقبال پرونده هسته‌ای و مذاکرات با غرب هستیم. ازاین‌رو، پرسش اصلی این پژوهش این است که ادراک نظام شناختی دولت‌های یازدهم و دوازدهم ایران چه تاثیراتی در رویکرد‌های سیاسی اتخاذشده درقبال مذاکرات هسته‌ای ایران با غرب داشته است؟ در این پژوهش از روش کیفی با رویکرد توصیفی و تحلیلی استفاده شده است. شایان ذکر است ابزار گردآوری داده نیز فیش‌برداری و خوانش کتاب‌ها، مقالات و سایت‌های اینترنتی است. به‌دلیل اکتشافی بودن پژوهش از دادن فرضیه پرهیز می‌شود. درنهایت با تحلیل داده‌های توصیفی می‌توان بیان کرد که نظام شناختی و گفتمان‌های حاکم بر باور این دولت، در دگرگونی رویکرد سیاسی ایران درقبال مذاکرات هسته‌ای با غرب از تقابل به تنش‌زدایی تاثیرگذار بوده است.

the perception of the cognitive system of the 11th and 12th governments of the nuclear negotiations between iran and the west

examining the cognitive systems of politicians and policymakers is one of the most important frameworks for understanding and analyzing the behaviors, actions, and decision-making processes of these individuals. the cognitive systems of individuals encompass their perceptions, worldviews, beliefs, values, and the prevailing discourses surrounding these beliefs, all of which significantly influence these processes. the decision-making patterns regarding iran’s nuclear policy as a central issue of foreign policy in the post-revolution era have undeniably been shaped by cognitive psychology, personality cults, perceptual structures, and the leadership styles of the ruling politicians in this domain. this study aims to investigate and understand the cognitive system of the rouhani administration and its impacts on iran’s political approaches and decisions regarding the nuclear dossier and negotiations with the west. therefore, the main research question is: how has the cognitive perception of the eleventh and twelfth administrations of iran influenced the political approaches taken in the context of iran’s nuclear negotiations with the west? the authors employ a qualitative methodology with a descriptive and analytical approach. it is noteworthy that the data collection tools include note-taking and reviewing books, articles, and websites. due to the exploratory nature of this research, hypotheses are deliberately avoided. ultimately, through the analysis of descriptive data, it can be stated that the cognitive system and the discourses dominant in the beliefs of this administration have played a crucial role in transforming iran’s political approach towards nuclear negotiations with the west, shifting from confrontation to détente.systematic and personality characteristics of leaders are among the factors that have a deep and undeniable role and influence on political approaches and foreign policy in general in relations between countries. the study and investigation of politics and personality has been one of the most important and oldest subjects of foreign policy analysts’ attention, because they have always been interested in understanding these issues, how leaders see the world, what their perception and understanding of issues are. what motivates them and how they make decisions.in fact, what shapes and directs the behavior and decisions of leaders is their mental perception of reality, and any changes in this perception can be the origin and root of changes in the field of foreign policy.in other words, the political system of the countries in any form and in any form, the discourses and elites who take power in the country’s political arena, shape their foreign policy according to their mental-psychological constructions and perceptions. and understanding the roots and mental bases of politicians and statesmen is the most important step for foreign policy analysis.the path of diplomacy and nuclear decision-making patterns of the islamic republic of iran, as the biggest foreign policy challenge after the islamic revolution, has been undeniably influenced by the psychology of cognition, personality cult, perceptual constructions and leadership style of the ruling politicians in foreign policy. in fact, although several factors have an effect on the type of decision-making, understanding and understanding of a subject by a leader, his perception, beliefs and values ​​play a much more important role in this process.therefore, the understanding of the decision-making pattern and political approach of the leaders will be incomplete without the systemic recognition and their personality structure in foreign policy.each dominant discourse puts a new approach and strategy on the agenda, according to the type of perceptual space. in fact, the foreign policy of the islamic republic of iran, despite having a common semantic system, has different and even conflicting narratives and readings, which can be seen in a macro view in a completely undeniable way, influenced by mental and perceptual constructions, as well as the political orientations of iran’s foreign policy have always been between the perceptual-cognitive space of the conservative wing and the reformist wing, and this has caused iran’s foreign policy to gradually become a confusing combination of ideology and pragmatism.the important issue is that cognitive filters have an undeniable effect in shaping the foreign policy of the islamic republic, which is a clear example of these effects in accordance with the cognitive and perceptual structures of the ruling leaders in the foreign policy of different discourses. one of the most important challenges of the islamic republic was the nuclear conflict, which affected the relations between iran and the actors of the international system in all dimensions. with the increasing efficiency of the rouhani government, on the other hand, the foreign policy decision makers, the views and understanding of the politicians and the emergence of new literature in the field changed. the foreign policy all indicated the formation of a new chapter in iran’s foreign policy, the central signifier of this chapter and the new discourse was the concept of moderation.this sign meant creating and establishing a balance between the realism of the logic of the nation-state of the islamic republic of iran and the idealism of the islamic revolution in foreign policy.as a result, according to this sign, in foreign policy, in addition to paying attention to the ideals of the islamic revolution, domestic and international realities were also considered, so that the ideals did not cause the realities to be overlooked and the realities did not cause the ideals to be