an anesthesia checklist: a survey of compliance and attitudes

Introduction: while anesthesia is regarded as one of the safest clinical specialties, continuing to ensure patient safety requires vigilance. the growing complexity of modern medicine makes it extremely dangerous to rely on the absence of human error. there is evidence to suggest that anesthesiologists are less inclined to use checklists than surgeons and nurses. seniority has also been shown to dictate the acceptance of checklists. materials and methods: we assessed compliance with, and attitudes to an anesthesia checklist, comparing by seniority. 1. analysed a representative sample (n=247, 95% ci, 5% me) of general anesthesia cases performed in one year (n=747), calculating percentage compliance in each case. we compared groups by seniority with mannwhitney u testing using spss. 2. we assessed attitudes using a 20item questionnaire, consisting of five themed subscales. descriptive statistics were generated. results: mean total compliance with the checklist was 91.6% (95% ci: 90.692.6%). nonconsultant compliance was estimated at 94.4% (95% ci: 93.095.8%), compared to 91.6% (95% ci: 89.593.7%) in the consultant group. higher nonconsultant compliance was significant, compared to the consultant group (p=0.045). conclusion: the nonconsultant group demonstrated greater compliance. attitudes to the checklist were similar amongst the two groups with lack of time and lack of training cited as two major barriers to use. both senior and junior anesthesiologists felt it had a positive impact on patient safety.