|
|
decision-making and collective choice against terrorism in the unsc
|
|
|
|
|
نویسنده
|
jafari ali akbar
|
منبع
|
راهبرد سياسي - 2021 - دوره : 4 - شماره : 15 - صفحه:27 -55
|
چکیده
|
Decisions as outputs of international organizations are highly influenced by different motivations. presence of veto powers, heterogeneity of preferences and the rules governing decisions lead to study the decisionmaking in the united nations security council. but the main puzzle of the current paper is to discover the motivations influencing on decisionmaking in the unsc. according to our research, precedent and organizational doctrines guide the veto holders’ decisions. the costs of unilateral decisions push the members of unsc to act based on collective bargaining and decisions which not only modify the opportunity structures but also help them to meet their rather different preferences. one of the most notable cases that these double doctrines are heavily visible in the unsc activity is the area of the terrorism. in this case, the unsc as an international political organization providing collective response to the international security threats by resorting to agreed language and political coalition.
|
کلیدواژه
|
international organizations ,decision-making ,unsc ,collective action ,terrorism
|
آدرس
|
university of mazandaran, faculty of law and political science, department of political sciences, iran
|
پست الکترونیکی
|
a.jafari@umz.ac.ir
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DecisionMaking and Collective Choice against Terrorism in the UNSC
|
|
|
Authors
|
Jafari Ali Akbar
|
Abstract
|
Decisions as outputs of international organizations are highly influenced by different motivations. Presence of veto powers, heterogeneity of preferences and the rules governing decisions lead to study the decisionmaking in the United Nations Security Council. But the main puzzle of the current paper is to discover the motivations influencing on decisionmaking in the UNSC. According to our research, precedent and organizational doctrines guide the veto holders’ decisions. The costs of unilateral decisions push the members of UNSC to act based on collective bargaining and decisions which not only modify the opportunity structures but also help them to meet their rather different preferences. One of the most notable cases that these double doctrines are heavily visible in the UNSC activity is the area of the terrorism. In this case, the UNSC as an international political organization providing collective response to the international security threats by resorting to agreed language and political coalition.
|
Keywords
|
International Organizations ,Decisionmaking ,UNSC ,collective action ,terrorism
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|