منصب المرجعیة بین الاجتهاد والاعلمیة

It is noted that the public official, who had no luck in reconciling to collect science at any time, or that he was successful in obtaining the machine of science and achieving certain levels of his perceptions, but did not succeed in reaching the queen of devising and collecting the rulings from his detailed evidence at other times, and that leads to discharge, so that he can stand up and obey all of the pre-orders and prohibitions, whether they are included in the holy book or the infallible sunnah. in this sense, the commitment to the rituals of slavery and the need to thank al-mun'im and the consequences of the reward or the result of punishment of the negligence when the will of god almighty requires access to access controls for sources of development. but if we ask the question: is the commitment to all of the above could come from a vacuum or that there is a source of the need to be identified accurately, what is required is to search for quality not quantity as they express. those who want to reach the discharge of the duty to double the effort and access to that acclaimed quality. yes, it is necessary to search and rely on who has the argument on these provisions of the return of the ignorant to the world and this is the mind of the mind, as well as the biography of the wise. this is what we express in the scientific term of reference in tradition. the charge is due when it is not possible to collect the argument on the assignment to it, meaning that it did not reach the stage of extracting the provisions of the evidence (fluorescence) of the book and the sunnah and collect the argument on it or could not even come to the objects, in order to embarrass him in not knowing the methods of precaution, it is up to him to rely on who has the argument. however, it does not stop when previously, if we look away from those three previous faces, is it possible to rely on this authenticity (authenticity of work) in accordance with the above, taking into account considerations in the order in question, or it is another matter that could be considered under the title of the title of the media in tradition, should we imitate who is the knowledgeable? who knows the truth؟