Execution of the Deed of Recognition of Mortgage Rights in TheMataram District Court

This study aims to find out and analyze the interpretation of the law on the clause of their ownpower as referred to in article 6 of the mortgage law. to find out and analyze the interpretation of thelaw regarding substitution prohibition clauses in the power of attorney imposing mortgage rights asreferred to in article 15 paragraph (1) letter (b) of the mortgage rights act. the method used is thenormative method with a statutory approach and a case approach. article 6 the underwriting right act isalso a binding force that if the debtor fails to promise, the first underwriting right holder has the right tosell the underwriting right object on his own power through a public auction, or in other words, both thepower of the first underwriting right holder is included or not included in the deed of granting theunderwriting right in question, still if the debtor has been proven to be in violation of the promise ordefault on the credit agreement, the first mortgage holder has the power or authority to sell the object ofthe underwriting right through a public auction mechanism through the district court. this wasreinforced by the supreme court decision no. 3021 date january 30, 1986. who considers that theexecution parate must go through court assistance according to the principles of procedural law.