perspective on settlement of general election disputes through mediation,adjudication and legal efforts: settlement of state administrative judicialdisputes

General elections (pemilu in bahasa indonesia) are an important instrument in every democraticcountry that adopts a system of representation. in general, there are 2 (two) dispute settlement paths,which are litigation (dispute settlement path through the judicial route) and non-litigation paths (peacefulsettlement outside the court). the type of research used in this legal research is normative juridical type ofresearch which is carried out by examining library material which is secondary data and also calledlibrary research. dispute on election consist of disputes between election participants or betweencandidates, administrative disputes or state administration of elections, and disputes over electionresults. while crime in election is handled by the election supervisor, which is followed up by thegeneral election commission (kpu), the regional kpu, and the regional kpu and kpu imposeadministrative sanctions. whereas the violation of the code of ethics for the election organizers at thehearing was decided by the election organizer honorary board (dkpp). furthermore, disputes betweenelection participants or between candidates are settled by the election supervisor, election administrationdisputes are settled by the election supervisory body (bawaslu) by mediation, adjudication and can beappealed to the state administrative court, while the election results are settled by the constitutionalcourt.