applying the straftoemetingsleiddraad in a corruption case in indonesia

Criminal disparity in a corruption case is unacceptable in philosophical reasoning, sociologically,or even from the perspective of legal objectives, which in theory and factual facts lead to judicial capriseand the presumption of judicial corruption in the verdict, where it will adversely affect the fair justice ofthe convicted or for the indonesian people as victims of corruption. criminal law gives alternative inorder to give pressure the criminal disparity through straftoemetingsleiddraad or guidance of sentencingof the judges in prosecuting without violating the principle of freedom of judges, either through theindonesian supreme court regulations for now as ius constitutum, or through the legislation process ofthe anti-corruption act for the future as ius constituendium.