construction of the legal framework for strengthening the halal industry inindonesia

This study discusses: (i) the existence of a halal certification regime in strengthening the halalindustry in indonesia (ii) problems in the regulation, implementation and supervision, as well asgovernance of the halal certificate regime given in strengthening the halal industry in indonesia, (iii)model of strengthening certificates halal given in strengthening the halal industry in indonesia.this type of research is normative legal research and is assisted / strengthened by empirical legalmaterials that examine the principles of law, legal systematics, synchronization of legal norms, historyand comparative law using methods of approach to legislation, conceptual philosophy, and comparativecompared to malaysia and singapore, (common law system) japan and francis (with a civil lawsystem), the theoretical framework used as a knife for analysis in this dissertation are: natural theory ofnatural law, theory of problems (problems of problems), theory of formation of legislation, theory oforder legislation (hierarchy theory of legal norms), theory of the legal system (law system theory)theory of authority (authority theory), theory of public policy (public policy theory) and theory oforgans of legal entities.the results of the analysis of the three main issues are that: the results of the study are asfollows: (i) the existence of a halal certification regime in strengthening the halal industry in indonesia:philosophically, normative juridical has been regulated and is in doubt, sociologist not functioning, thejph law weakens what was good before; (ii) problems in the regulation, implementation and supervisionas well as governance of the halal certificate regime given in the strengthening of the halal industry inindonesia, the norms contained in the provisions of the jph law, article 5 uujph is officially takenover by the government by forming bpjph, articles 6 and 7 ( mutual tug of authority, confusion in theimplementation of authority between the government and mui), article 47 uujph (paragraphs 2 and 3)delineates the authority of mui, article 14 uujph is not yet clear standardization of operationalperformance, article 4 uujph has not been implemented, pp 29 of 2019 regulation of the minister oftrade is in conflict with jph law, in the case of kma no. 982, it contradicts the jph law, (iii) modelof strengthening halal certificates given in strengthening the halal industry in indonesia institutionalreform, institutional construction, strengthening legal duties in halal product certification,strengthening halal certification protection on human rights, strengthening the legal configuration,halal nationalization, realized through zones halal, halal harmonization with islamic economists,(legitimacy, interpretation. sanctions, jurisdictions) which are expected to be able to give birth to compliance of producers; consumer awareness and wisdom; government attention in the form ofsupervision and law enforcement; avoid the halal globalization practice of religious fundamentalism,food which is essentially halal and thayib (good); the achievement of legal ideals; the legal culture ofthe community is good; ultimately realizes the legal certainty of halal products.