israeli obstinacy: a major hurdle in palestine peace talks

The conflict between palestinians and the jews has been ongoing for seven decades. despite numerous proposed solutions from the united nations, the organization of islamic cooperation, and various countries involved in the issue, the crisis persists. the past three decades of right-wing leadership in israel have shown that supported by major european powers and the us, meaningful negotiations are not anticipated from israel. meaningful talks would involve agreements on recognizing palestine, affirming palestinian sovereignty, establishing an independent palestinian state, allowing for the return of displaced populations and determining the status of jerusalem as the capital. the ascension of the extreme right in israel has clouded the prospects for peace, augmenting the israeli demands for more privilege, while sidelining those of the other side. this article posits that israel’s negotiation approach under the right-wing is built on a zero-sum mentality, with minimal concessions offered to the palestinians. moreover, its various political, security and economic pressures on palestinians, along with sustained us and eu sanctions and its military superiority, render any peace model unattainable. this uncompromising approach, intended to impose unilateral conditions and prolong talks to thwart the establishment of an independent palestinian state, accounts for the recurrent failure of negotiations. israel’s aim in these talks appears to demoralize the palestinians and prevent the realization of their aspirations by imposing “the real”.