از نظام نشانه ای تا نظام ابژه ای در شازده احتجاب گلشیری

نشانه شناسی در فرایندی تحولی، از نشانه شناسی ابژه محور به نشانه شناسی سوژه محور و سپس به نشانه شناسی پدیدارشناختی گرایش می یابد. حاصل چنین بینشی، شکل گیری رابطه ای مبتنی بر چالش یا تطبیق میان سوژه و ابژه و جهان هستی است. برپایۀ این، شاهد نوعی تاثیر و تاثّر ابژه ها و سوژه ها هستیم. معنی نیز در اثر درهم آمیختگی سوژه و ابژه به طور سرایتی از یکی به دیگری منتقل می شود. ابژه ها نیز در نقشی بیناابژه ای در تعامل یا چالش با یکدیگر قرار می گیرند و این امر بر عملکرد و رفتار فرهنگی و اجتماعی سوژه های انسانی تاثیر می گذارد و نوع تبادلات آنها را تعیین می کند. درواقع، ابژه بر صدر می نشیند و با وجه مشروعیت بخش و اقتدارگرای خود می تواند به فروپاشی ساحت حضوری سوژه یا بازاستقرار آن منجر شود. مسالۀ مقاله این است که این فرایند چگونه و مبتنی بر کدام ویژگی ها و گفتمان ها تحقق می یابد. برپایۀ این، در پژوهشِ حاضر به بررسی این دو پرسش مهم پرداخته می شود که ویژگی ها و بایسته های گذر از نظام نشانه ای به نظام ابژه ای و کارکردهای گفتمانی آن در شازده احتجاب گلشیری چگونه است؟ همچنین جایگاه فرایند معنایی ابژه و نقش آن در وضعیت حضوری سوژه چیست؟ درواقع هدف اصلی این مقاله بررسی سیر تحول از نظام نشانه ای به نظام ابژه ای و استقرار نظام ابژه ای و جایگاه های فرایند معنایی آن است. نتیجه نشان می دهد ابژه ها در فرایند گذر از نشانه تا ابژه شدگی، جایگاه اقتدارگری، پروتزی، مکانی، کنشی، نمودی، طنزگونگی، ارجاعی، فرهنگی، تاریخی و مشروعیت بخشی پیدا می کنند.

from the sign system to the object system in golshiri’s shazde ehtejab

semiotics, in a transformational process, moves from object-oriented semiotics to subject-oriented and then toward phenomenology, resulting in the formation of a relation in accordance with the challenge or adaptation among the subject, the object, and the world. in so doing, it influences objects and subjects. as a result of the object-subject entanglement, meaning is transferred from one to the other. objects interact with or challenge each other in an inter-objective context, affecting the performance and cultural and social behavior of human subjects and determining the type of their interactions. in fact, with its legitimizing and authoritarian aspect, the object could reestablish or collapse the subject’s presence. this article tries to understand how and through which features and discourses this process is completed. the present research investigates two central questions: what are the fundamental qualities and requirements in the transition from the sign system to the object system and its discourse functions in golshiri’s shazde ehtejab and what are the positions of the object’s semantic process and its role in the presence of the subject. the main goal of this article is to examine the transition from a sign system to an object system, its establishment, and its semantic processes. the result shows that in the transitional process from the sign system to the object system, the objects find an authoritarian, prosthetic, spatial, active, representational, ironic, referential, cultural, historical, and legitimizing position. extended abstract1.introductionin phenomenological semantics, we are witnessing the formation of an interactive or challenging relation between subject and object. this relation spreads toward the world of the objects, resulting in their challenges and interactions with each other. from another perspective, it makes its way toward the world of human subjects, controlling their actions and social and cultural behavior. the result of this process is to move beyond objectification and elevate the object to a cultural and symbolic order. the underlying question in this process as well as in the interaction among signs, objects, and subjects concerns the position and function of the object. therefore, the following fundamental questions are posed in the present article regarding the novel in question: what are the positions of specific objects in the transition from the sign system to the object system? what role does this position play in the collapse or re-establishment of the presence of the novel’s referential subject? what is the relation between the legitimacy discourse and the object? what is the role of the object in legitimizing the discourse? what is the position of the object’s semantic process in the literary discourse? and what is its role in the suspension of conditions and the creation of a buffer and transactional space? 2.theoretical frameworkone of the fundamental concepts in object semantics is the analysis of the role and position of the object’s semantic process in inter-subjective and inter-objective interactions. the object, through fusion and bodily contacts, enables the subject’s interaction with the world. in addition, due to the object’s modal capacity, it takes charge of the subject’s activities. as a stimulus, it provokes the subject to a specific direction, and triggers its action and potency. in the object system, the object serves as a medium to balance the relation between the subject and the world, creating certain actions in subjects, enabling them to balance their behavior and action in relation to the object. the object also takes prosthetic and legitimizer roles. in such a structure, the object takes over the subject’s position, thus collapsing the subject’s system of presence. on the other hand, through the object’s legitimizing function, the subject’s presence is restored.