تاثیر خودشیفتگی مدیران مدارس بر سکوت سازمانی معلمان با نقش میانجی ریاکاری سازمانی

روش پژوهش توصیفی-همبستگی بود. 255 دبیر متوسطه دوم شهر زاهدان به شیوه نمونه گیری تصادفی- طبقه ای (بر حسب جنسیت) از طریق سه پرسشنامه خودشیفتگی، ریاکاری سازمانی و سکوت سازمانی مورد مطالعه قرار گرفتند. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها از ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و مدل معادلات ساختاری با کمک نرم افزارهای اس پی اس اس و لیزرل استفاده شد. بر اساس یافته ها اثر مستقیم خودشیفتگی مدیران بر سکوت سازمانی، اثر مستقیم خودشیفتگی مدیران بر ریاکاری سازمانی و اثر مستقیم ریاکاری سازمانی بر سکوت سازمانی معنادار بود. همچنین اثر غیرمستقیم خودشیفتگی مدیران بر سکوت سازمانی با میانجیگری ریاکاری سازمانی، معنادار بود. بنابراین میتوان نتیجهگیری کرد که خودشیفتگی مدیران هم به طور مستقیم و هم به طور مستقیم و از طریق متغیر میانجی ریاکاری سازمانی با سکوت سازمانی معلمان رابطه مثبت و معنادار دارد.

The Impact ofschool principals’ Narcissism on Teachers’ Organizational Silence with Mediating Role of Organizational Hypocrisy

The purpose of this study was to investigate the the impact narcissism on teachers’ organizational silencerelationship between manager’s narcissism and The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between manager’s narcissism and teachers’ organizational silence with mediating role of organizational hypocrisy. This study is an applied and correlation research method based on structural equation modeling. 255 teachers of Zahedan city were studied by stratified random sampling method. To collect information, three questionnaires were used: Narcissism (Ghoreyshi Rad, 2015), organizational hypocrisy (Adapted from Hadavinejad, Danaeifard, Azar, Khaefelahi, 2010) and organizational silence (Van Dyne, Ang, Botero, 2003). For data analysis the Pearson correlation coefficient and structural equation modeling were used by SPSS and Lisrel software. Based on results the the amount of correlation coefficient of manager’s narcissism and teachers’ organizational hypocrisy (r=0.407, p < 0.001), manager’s narcissism and teachers’ organizational silence (r=0.398, p < 0.001), organizational hypocrisy with teachers’ organizational silence (r=0.331, p < 0.01) was positive and significant. The direct effect of manager’s narcissis on organizational silence (β=0.36, t=4.54), the direct effect of manager’s narcissism on teachers’ organizational hypocrisy (β=0.45, t=6.59) and the direct effect organizational hypocrisy on teachers’ organizational silence (β=0.2, t=2.54) was significant. The indirect effect of manager’s narcissism and teachers’ organizational silence was also significant with the mediator role of organizational hypocrisy (β=0.09). Thus can conclude that manager’s narcissism either directly or indirectly, through the mediating variable of organizational hypocrisy has a positive and significant relationship with the teachers’ organizational silence.Torganizational silence with mediating role of organizational hypocrisy. This study is an applied and correlation research method based on structural equation modeling. 255 teachers of Zahedan city were studied by stratified random sampling method. To collect information, three questionnaires were used: Narcissism (Ghoreyshi Rad, 2015), organizational hypocrisy (Adapted from Hadavinejad, Danaeifard, Azar, Khaefelahi, 2010) and organizational silence (Van Dyne, Ang, Botero, 2003). For data analysis the Pearson correlation coefficient and structural equation modeling were used by SPSS and Lisrel software. Based on results the the amount of correlation coefficient of manager’s narcissism and organizational hypocrisy (r=0.407, p < 0.001), manager’s narcissism and organizational silence (r=0.398, p < 0.001), organizational hypocrisy with organizational silence (r=0.331, p < 0.01) was significant. The direct effect of manager’s narcissis on organizational silence (β=0.36, t=4.54), the direct effect of manager’s narcissism on organizational hypocrisy (β=0.45, t=6.59) and the direct effect organizational hypocrisy on organizational silence (β=0.2, t=2.54) was significant. The indirect effect of manager’s narcissism and organizational silence was also significant with the mediator role of organizational hypocrisy (β=0.09). Thus can conclude that manager’s narcissism either directly or indirectly, through the mediating variable of organizational hypocrisy has a positive and significant relationship with the organizational silence of employees.The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between manager’s narcissism and organizational silence with mediating role of organizational hypocrisy. This study is an applied and correlation research method based on structural equation modeling. 255 teachers of Zahedan city were studied by stratified random sampling method. To collect information, three questionnaires were used: Narcissism (Ghoreyshi Rad, 2015), organizational hypocrisy (Adapted from Hadavinejad, Danaeifard, Azar, Khaefelahi, 2010) and organizational silence (Van Dyne, Ang, Botero, 2003). For data analysis the Pearson correlation coefficient and structural equation modeling were used by SPSS and Lisrel software. Based on results the the amount of correlation coefficient of manager’s narcissism and organizational hypocrisy (r=0.407, p < 0.001), manager’s narcissism and organizational silence (r=0.398, p < 0.001), organizational hypocrisy with organizational silence (r=0.331, p < 0.01) was significant. The direct effect of manager’s narcissis on organizational silence (β=0.36, t=4.54), the direct effect of manager’s narcissism on organizational hypocrisy (β=0.45, t=6.59) and the direct effect organizational hypocrisy on organizational silence (β=0.2, t=2.54) was significant. The indirect effect of manager’s narcissism and organizational silence was also significant with the mediator role of organizational hypocrisy (β=0.09). Thus can conclude that manager’s narcissism either directly or indirectly, through the mediating variable of organizational hypocrisy has a positive and significant relationship with the organizational silence of employees.The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between manager’s narcissism and organizational silence with mediating role of organizational hypocrisy. This study is an applied and correlation research method based on structural equation modeling. 255 teachers of Zahedan city were studied by stratified random sampling method. To collect information, three questionnaires were used: Narcissism (Ghoreyshi Rad, 2015), organizational hypocrisy (Adapted from Hadavinejad, Danaeifard, Azar, Khaefelahi, 2010) and organizational silence (Van Dyne, Ang, Botero, 2003). For data analysis the Pearson correlation coefficient and structural equation modeling were used by SPSS and Lisrel software. Based on results the the amount of correlation coefficient of manager’s narcissism and organizational hypocrisy (r=0.407, p < 0.001), manager’s narcissism and organizational silence (r=0.398, p < 0.001), organizational hypocrisy with organizational silence (r=0.331, p < 0.01) was significant. The direct effect of manager’s narcissis on organizational silence (β=0.36, t=4.54), the direct effect of manager’s narcissism on organizational hypocrisy (β=0.45, t=6.59) and the direct effect organizational hypocrisy on organizational silence (β=0.2, t=2.54) was significant. The indirect effect of manager’s narcissism and organizational silence was also significant with the mediator role of organizational hypocrisy (β=0.09). Thus can conclude that manager’s narcissism either directly or indirectly, through the mediating variable of organizational hypocrisy has a positive and significant relationship with the organizational silence of employees.The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between manager’s narcissism and organizational silence with mediating role of organizational hypocrisy. This study is an applied and correlation research method based on structural equation modeling. 255 teachers of Zahedan city were studied by stratified random sampling method. To collect information, three questionnaires were used: Narcissism (Ghoreyshi Rad, 2015), organizational hypocrisy (Adapted from Hadavinejad, Danaeifard, Azar, Khaefelahi, 2010) and organizational silence (Van Dyne, Ang, Botero, 2003). For data analysis the Pearson correlation coefficient and structural equation modeling were used by SPSS and Lisrel software. Based on results the the amount of correlation coefficient of manager’s narcissism and organizational hypocrisy (r=0.407, p < 0.001), manager’s narcissism and organizational silence (r=0.398, p < 0.001), organizational hypocrisy with organizational silence (r=0.331, p < 0.01) was significant. The direct effect of manager’s narcissis on organizational silence (β=0.36, t=4.54), the direct effect of manager’s narcissism on organizational hypocrisy (β=0.45, t=6.59) and the direct effect organizational hypocrisy on organizational silence (β=0.2, t=2.54) was significant. The indirect effect of manager’s narcissism and organizational silence was also significant with the mediator role of organizational hypocrisy (β=0.09)