شناسایی شاخص های روش های یاددهی و یادگیری مطلوب برای دروس رشته های علوم انسانی دانشگاه ها و میزان توجه به آن ها

پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی شاخص های روش های یاددهی و یادگیری مطلوب برای دروس رشته های علوم انسانی دانشگاه ها و میزان توجه به آنها انجام شد. در پژوهش حاضر، از طرح ترکیبی و از نوع اکتشافی متوالی استفاده شد. در بخش کیفی، از روش مطالعه موردی و در بخش کمی، از روش توصیفی – پیمایشی بهره گرفته شده است. در بخش کیفی با 20 نفر از متخصصان و اعضای هیئت‌علمی دانشگاه های کشور که در حوزه روش‌های یاددهی و یادگیری اهل نظر هستند، مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته به عمل آمد. جامعه آماری بخش کمی دانشجویان کارشناسی دانشگاهها بودند که به روش خوشه ای چندمرحله ای، تعداد 360 نفر به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. داده های پژوهش در بخش کمی از طریق پرسشنامه محقق ساخته مستخرج از بخش کیفی جمع آوری شد. برای تعیین روایی سوال‌های مصاحبه و پرسشنامه از روایی صوری و محتوایی و برای برآورد پایایی پرسشنامه از ضریب آلفای کرونباخ استفاده شد. برای تحلیل دادههای پژوهش در بخش کیفی از روش روش های ساختاری و تفسیری و در بخش کمی از آمار توصیفی و استنباطی بهره گرفته شد. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد چهارده شاخص از منظر مصاحبه‌شوندگان مهم‌ترین شاخص های روش‌های یاددهی و یادگیری بودند و می توان از شاخص های شناسایی شده برای ارزشیابی و بازنگری روش های یاددهی و یادگیری دروس رشته‌های علوم انسانی دانشگاه ها استفاده نمود. یافته های کمی نشان داد میانگین توجه به شاخص های روش‌های یاددهی و یادگیری در دروس رشته های علوم انسانی دانشگاهها نامطلوب بوده و نیاز به توجه بیشتری دارد.

Identification the Indices of Desirable Teaching and Learning methods regarding the Humanity Courses for Universities and the Extent of attention them

The present study is aimed towards identification the indices of desirable teaching and learning methods in regard with the Humanity Courses for universities and the extent to which these indices are attention. In the present study, exploratory mixedmethods research was used. In the quantitative section, a case study method and in the quantitative section, a descriptivesurvey method was employed. For the qualitative section, we underwent quasistructured interviews with 20 distinguished and qualified experts and faculty members of universities having their expertise in Teaching and Learning methods. Also, 360 of the students of universities comprised the quantitative statistical population. This number of participants was selected using multistage cluster sampling method. The research data were collected in a quantitative part through a researchermade questionnaire extracted from the qualitative section. To examine the reliability of interview questions and questionnaires, we recruited formal and content reliability. And, we used Cronbach’s alpha coefficients to evaluate the validity of our questionnaires. We also employed the Structural and interpretative methods in the qualitative section and descriptive and inferential statistics in the quantitative section to wage on analyzing the data. The results indicated that the interviewees outlined fourteen indices as the salient indices of Teaching and Learning methods and it can be argued that the recognized indices can be recruited to evaluation and revise the Teaching and Learning methods of courses in different majors of the humanities. The quantitative findings also indicated that the range and degree of attention and corresponding to the indices of teaching and learning methods seem to be less than desirable. Therefore, it necessarily requires far more significant attention. The present study is aimed towards identification the indices of desirable teaching and learning methods in regard with the Humanity Courses for universities and the extent to which these indices are attention. In the present study, exploratory mixedmethods research was used. In the quantitative section, a case study method and in the quantitative section, a descriptivesurvey method was employed. For the qualitative section, we underwent quasistructured interviews with 20 distinguished and qualified experts and faculty members of universities having their expertise in Teaching and Learning methods. Also, 360 of the students of universities comprised the quantitative statistical population. This number of participants was selected using multistage cluster sampling method. The research data were collected in a quantitative part through a researchermade questionnaire extracted from the qualitative section. To examine the reliability of interview questions and questionnaires, we recruited formal and content reliability. And, we used Cronbach’s alpha coefficients to evaluate the validity of our questionnaires. We also employed the Structural and interpretative methods in the qualitative section and descriptive and inferential statistics in the quantitative section to wage on analyzing the data. The results indicated that the interviewees outlined fourteen indices as the salient indices of Teaching and Learning methods and it can be argued that the recognized indices can be recruited to evaluation and revise the Teaching and Learning methods of courses in different majors of the humanities. The quantitative findings also indicated that the range and degree of attention and corresponding to the indices of teaching and learning methods seem to be less than desirable. Therefore, it necessarily requires far more significant attention. The present study is aimed towards identification the indices of desirable teaching and learning methods in regard with the Humanity Courses for universities and the extent to which these indices are attention. In the present study, exploratory mixedmethods research was used. In the quantitative section, a case study method and in the quantitative section, a descriptivesurvey method was employed. For the qualitative section, we underwent quasistructured interviews with 20 distinguished and qualified experts and faculty members of universities having their expertise in Teaching and Learning methods. Also, 360 of the students of universities comprised the quantitative statistical population. This number of participants was selected using multistage cluster sampling method. The research data were collected in a quantitative part through a researchermade questionnaire extracted from the qualitative section. To examine the reliability of interview questions and questionnaires, we recruited formal and content reliability. And, we used Cronbach’s alpha coefficients to evaluate the validity of our questionnaires. We also employed the Structural and interpretative methods in the qualitative section and descriptive and inferential statistics in the quantitative section to wage on analyzing the data. The results indicated that the interviewees outlined fourteen indices as the salient indices of Teaching and Learning methods and it can be argued that the recognized indices can be recruited to evaluation and revise the Teaching and Learning methods of courses in different majors of the humanities. The quantitative findings also indicated that the range and degree of attention and corresponding to the indices of teaching and learning methods seem to be less than desirable. Therefore, it necessarily requires far more significant attention. The present study is aimed towards identification the indices of desirable teaching and learning methods in regard with the Humanity Courses for universities and the extent to which these indices are attention. In the present study, exploratory mixedmethods research was used. In the quantitative section, a case study method and in the quantitative section, a descriptivesurvey method was employed. For the qualitative section, we underwent quasistructured interviews with 20 distinguished and qualified experts and faculty members of universities having their expertise in Teaching and Learning methods. Also, 360 of the students of universities comprised the quantitative statistical population. This number of participants was selected using multistage cluster sampling method. The research data were collected in a quantitative part through a researchermade questionnaire extracted from the qualitative section. To examine the reliability of interview questions and questionnaires, we recruited formal and content reliability. And, we used Cronbach’s alpha coefficients to evaluate the validity of our questionnaires. We also employed the Structural and interpretative methods in the qualitative section and descriptive and inferential statistics in the quantitative section to wage on analyzing the data. The results indicated that the interviewees outlined fourteen indices as the salient indices of Teaching and Learning methods and it can be argued that the recognized indices can be recruited to evaluation and revise the Teaching and Learning methods of courses in different majors of the humanities. The quantitative findings also indicated that the range and degree of attention and corresponding to the indices of teaching and learning methods seem to be less than desirable. Therefore, it necessarily requires far more significant attention.