|
|
مقایسه سناریوهای وضع موجود و طرح توسعه سیستم مدیریت پسماند شهرستان رشت با رویکرد ارزیابی چرخه حیات
|
|
|
|
|
نویسنده
|
فیضی صدف ,عابدین زاده نیلوفر ,پناهنده محمد
|
منبع
|
جغرافيا و پايداري محيط - 1402 - دوره : 13 - شماره : 3 - صفحه:89 -103
|
چکیده
|
مدیریت نامناسب پسماند پایداری محیطزیست را تهدید میکند. تعریف یک سیستم بهینه و پایدار جهت دفع پسماند نیازمند بررسی تمام فرایندهای درون سیستم، تاثیر آن بر محیطزیست، جنبههای اقتصادی، اجرایی و مصرف انرژی در هر بخش است. مطالعه حاضر باهدف مدلسازی سیستم مدیریت پسماند شهری شهرستان رشت بر اساس رویکرد ارزیابی چرخه حیات انجام شده است. در این راستا دو سناریوی دفع موجود و طرح توسعه برای آینده مقایسه شدند. سناریوی اول (دفع موجود) شامل فروش پسماند بازیافتی، پردازش بیولوژیکی (تولید کمپوست) و دفن است. در سناریوی دوم (طرح توسعه) مدنظر است که علاوه بر روشهای قبلی دفع، از زبالهسوز استفاده شود. پس از جمعآوری اطلاعات با استفاده از مدلiwm-2 به ارزیابی بار محیط زیستی هر یک از سناریوها پرداخته شد. نتایج نشان میدهد که در سناریوی دوم، بهصورت کلی میزان مصرف انرژی، آلایندهها و گرمایش جهانی نسبت به سناریوی اول کاهش مییابد. مقدار انرژی مصرفی کل برای سناریوی اول و دوم به ترتیب 3891+ و 1683234- گیگاژول است. همچنین در سناریوی دوم پتانسیل گرمایش جهانی به دلیل کاهش دفن، کاهش حملونقل و مصرف سوخت، بهبود تجهیزات و بازیابی انرژی کاهشیافته است. بهطورکلی عملکرد محیطزیستی در سناریوی دوم در صورت انجام تمهیدات لازم بهبود خواهد یافت که کاهش دفن، کاهش انتشار گازهای گلخانهای، افزایش میزان بازیافت و... از دلایل اصلی آن هستند. اگرچه زبالهسوزی سبب کاهش دفن پسماند در لندفیل سراوان میشود؛ اما همچنان طراحی مناسب محل دفن و بهرهبرداری انرژی از آن است که چرخه حیات مطلوبی از مدیریت پسماند را بر اساس سناریوی دوم ارائه میدهد. همچنین بهکارگیری روش زبالهسوزی تنها در صورت رعایت استانداردهای آلودگی و بازیابی انرژی توجیه محیط زیستی مییابد. تغییر اجزا و ظرفیت هر یک از گزینههای دفع نتایج جدیدی را ارائه میدهد که در این زمینه استفاده از سایر مدلها پیشنهاد میشود.
|
کلیدواژه
|
پسماند شهری، گرمایش جهانی، رشت، iwm-2
|
آدرس
|
پژوهشکده محیط زیست جهاد دانشگاهی (acecr), ایران, پژوهشکده محیط زیست جهاد دانشگاهی (acecr), ایران, پژوهشکده محیط زیست جهاد دانشگاهی (acecr), ایران
|
پست الکترونیکی
|
panahandeh@acecr.ac.ir
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
comparing the scenarios of current conditions and the development plan for the waste management system in rasht county using the life cycle approach
|
|
|
Authors
|
feyzi sadaf ,abedinzadeh niloufar ,panahandeh mohammad
|
Abstract
|
improper waste management threatens the sustainability of the environment. defining an optimal and sustainable system for waste disposal requires the examination of all processes within the system, their impact on the environment, economic aspects, implementation, and energy consumption in each part. the present study was conducted with the goal of modeling the municipal solid waste management system of rasht county based on the life cycle assessment approach. in this regard, two existing disposal scenarios and the development plan for the future were compared. the first scenario (existing disposal) includes the sale of recycled waste, biological processing (compost production), and landfilling. the second scenario (development plan) involves the use of an incinerator in addition to previous disposal methods. after collecting data using the iwm-2 model, the environmental impacts of each scenario were assessed. the results show that if the second scenario assumptions are applied, the amount of energy consumption, pollutants, and global warming will decrease relative to the first scenario. total energy consumption in the first and second scenarios is respectively +3891 and -1683234 gj. in addition, the global warming potential is reduced due to the reduction of landfills, reduced transportation and fuel consumption, improved equipment, and energy recovery in the second scenario. in general, environmental performance in the second scenario will be improved if appropriate action is taken. reducing landfill and greenhouse gases, increasing recycling, etc., are the main reasons. although incineration reduces landfilling in saravan, it is still the proper design of the landfill, and energy utilization from it provides a favorable life cycle of waste management based on the second scenario. moreover, the use of waste incineration is justified only if pollution and energy recovery standards are respected. modifying the components and capacity of each disposal option produces new results. in this context, it is suggested to use alternative models.extended abstract1-introductionincreasing municipal waste generation is one of the drawbacks of modern urban life. improper waste management threatens the sustainability of the environment and has a significant contribution to many environmental problems such as greenhouse gas emissions, reduction of resources, etc. defining an optimal and sustainable system for waste disposal requires the examination of all processes within the system, their impact on the environment, economic aspects, implementation, and energy consumption in each part. in this context, life cycle assessment as an environmental management tool can help decision-makers and managers recognize the environmental characteristics of options and optimal selection. currently, the waste management system in rasht county generally includes burial and biological processing. according to the sensitive and vulnerable ecosystem of the region, the investigations show that the management methods of waste disposal have not been effective and have not been successful in achieving the goals of optimal waste management. the present study was also conducted with the goal of modeling the waste management system of rasht county based on the life cycle assessment approach. this study emphasizes the comparison of energy consumption and global warming potential in different waste disposal scenarios.2-materials and methodsthis study focused on a comparison of the current state of rasht’s waste management system and its future development conditions. in this regard, two disposal scenarios: the existing (sale recycling waste (0/5 percent), biological processing (8/7 percent), and landfilling (90/8 percent)) and the development plan (sale recycling waste (4/9 percent), biological processing (43/3 percent), landfilling (4/6 percent), and incineration (47/2 percent)) have been compared. it is emphasized that the applied percentages are based on the current situation and the forecasted information for the waste management of rasht county in the future. also, the studied border starts from the collection of waste from rasht city as a transfer point and ends when it reaches the final disposal site. after collecting data using the iwm-2 model, the environmental impacts of each scenario were assessed. the windows in this model include the stages of collection, separation, and recycling of materials, biological processing, thermal processing, landfill, and energy production, respectively. the necessary information and assumptions at this stage were included based on the statistics obtained from the waste management organization as well as the contractual data available in the comprehensive waste management software.3- results and discussion1156 tons of municipal waste are produced and disposed of in rasht county daily. according to the physical analysis of waste, most components of it are organic materials with a share of 58.72 percent and a weight equal to 678.8 tons of total waste. the results show that if the second scenario assumptions are applied, the amount of energy consumption, pollutants, and global warming will decrease relative to the first scenario. total energy consumption in the first and second scenarios is respectively +3891 and -1683234 gj. the results show that the recycling of one kilogram of recycled materials preserves significant energy compared to the production of the same material from raw sources. in addition, the global warming potential is reduced due to the reduction of landfills, reduced transportation and fuel consumption, improved equipment, and energy recovery in the second scenario. in general, environmental performance in the second scenario will be improved if appropriate action is taken. reducing landfill and greenhouse gases, increasing recycling, etc., are the main reasons. the most greenhouse gases produced in the first scenario are ch4 and co2, which are released during the illegal landfilling in saravan.4- conclusionconducting a life cycle assessment study by comparing the environmental burdens caused by disposal processes allows decision-makers to identify the weak points and also the most appropriate disposal pattern and plan in line with sustainable development. although incineration reduces landfilling in saravan, it is still the proper design of the landfill, and energy utilization from it provides a favorable life cycle of waste management based on the second scenario. moreover, the use of waste incineration is justified only if pollution and energy recovery standards are respected. modifying the components and capacity of each disposal option produces new results. in this context, it is suggested to use alternative models. the results of this study were conducted according to the conditions and composition of the waste in the study area and can be different from the results of other studies. therefore, it is not possible to compare the results and generalize them to different regions, and naturally, the necessary measures will change based on environmental limitations and capabilities.
|
Keywords
|
municipal solid waste ,iwm-2 ,global warming ,rasht.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|