comparison of lichtenstein repair and new mesh implant technique in the treatment of indirect inguinal hernia

Objective: inguinal hernia surgery is one of the most commonly used surgical procedures in the world. the aim of this study was to compare the recurrence and postoperative complications between a new mesh implant technique in the floor of the inguinal canal with limited tissue repair on it and liechtenstein technique for inguinal hernia repair. methods: in this cross-sectional study, patients were studied by liechtenstein technique and a new technique of insertion of mesh at the foam of the inguinal canal with a limited tissue repair on it. data were collected by interview and we assessed the recurrence rate, urinary retention and post-operative pain. data were analyzed using spss software version 24. chi-square test and t test were used for quantitative data and p value less than 0.05 was considered significant. results: the mean age of patients was 49.28 ± 15.84. the mean age and sex ratio between the two groups were similar. recurrence was seen in 11 (1.83%) of all patients and the difference between the two groups was not significant. of all patients, 28 (4.7%) had urinary retention after surgery and the difference between the two groups was significant (p=0.01). of all patients, 91 (15.2%) had pain after three weeks and 29 (4.8%) had pain after six months. conclusion: the results showed that the new method had less complications concerning post-operative pain and urinary retention in comparison with the liechtenstein method as an acceptable method for inguinal hernia repair in future.